Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Youa True Vang v. A-1 Maintenance Service, 376 N.W.2d 479.

24 citing documents.

In the Appeal of Maren Erickson for Maltreatment of a Minor Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Appeal of Maren Erickson for Maltreatment of a Minor Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Trust Created by Eileen Carlson Kasell, dated September 10, 2013, as amended. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Serv., d 479, 482 (Minn. App. 1985) (stating that an actual determination regarding credibility is necessarily implicit in a fact -finder’s decision when there is conflicting evidence).
In the Matter of: City of Minneapolis v. Blayne Lehner, Relator. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of: City of Minneapolis v. Blayne Lehner, Relator. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Serv., (stating in syllabus that “[a] specific finding regarding the credibility of the witnesses was unnecessary, where such finding was implicit in [administrative agency’s] decision”).
Skarhus v. Davanni's Inc. 721 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Skarhus v. Davanni's Inc. 721 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Serv., (stating that hearsay may be sufficient to support ULJ’s decision).
Zahler v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 624 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Zahler v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 624 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Youa True Vang v. A-1 Maintenance Serv.
Jenson v. Department of Economic Security 617 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Jenson v. Department of Economic Security 617 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
“A decision regarding the credibility of witnesses rests within the discretion of the Commissioner, and the testimony should not be reweighed on appeal.” (Minn.App.
Polley v. Gopher Bearing Co. 478 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Clapper v. Budget Oil Co. 437 N.W.2d 722 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Clapper v. Budget Oil Co. 437 N.W.2d 722 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Vang v. A-1 Maintenance Service
Seemann v. Little Crow Trucking 412 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Seemann v. Little Crow Trucking 412 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See e.g., Arnolds Supply & Kleenit Co., Vang v. A-1 Maintenance Service
Bibeau v. Resistance Technology, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bibeau v. Resistance Technology, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See, e.g., Youa True Vang v. A-1 Maintenance Service
Arnolds Supply & Kleenit Co. v. Vang 410 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Arnolds Supply & Kleenit Co. v. Vang 410 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
While hearsay is admissible in unemployment compensation proceedings, Vang v. A-1 Maintenance Service, the Commissioner’s representative may accord such testimony the weight it deserves.
Engler v. Marshall Turkey Plant 409 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Engler v. Marshall Turkey Plant 409 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Vang v. A-1 Maintenance Service, -82 (Minn.Ct.App.1985); Wicker Enterprises
Willrich v. Top Temporary, Inc. 379 N.W.2d 731 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Willrich v. Top Temporary, Inc. 379 N.W.2d 731 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Vang v. A-1 Maintenance Service