Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hatton, 389 N.W.2d 229.

43 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In making this observation, rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Seneca Warrior Steeprock Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Seneca Warrior Steeprock Minn. Ct. App. 2024
anding for factual findings because the district court did not consider “several factual issues crucial to inevitable discovery”); (determining that the “facts of [the] case do not show that the police would inevitably have discovered” the illegally obtained evidence based on “probable cause to arrest” the defendant); (describing the inevitable-discovery exception as “narrow” and refusing to apply it broadly because that “would render the Fourth Amendment protection meaningless”), rev. denied (M
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(“Ordinarily, a mere guest of a premises may not give consent to search those premises 10 when his or her interest is inferior to that of the host.”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(citing Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 357-58, 88 S. Ct. 507, 514- 15 (1967)), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Khong Meng Kong Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Khong Meng Kong Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(holding that illegally-obtained evidence is not admissible under the inevitable discovery doctrine simply because the officers could have obtained a warrant prior to the search), review denied (Minn. Aug.
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Kyle Dean McCLAIN, Appellant 862 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Kyle Dean McCLAIN, Appellant 862 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“This exception has been applied in cases where the police officers possessed lawful means of discovery and were, *723 in fact, pursuing those lawful means prior to their illegal conduct.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Barajas 817 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Barajas 817 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
] lawful means of discovery and [are], in fact, pursuing those lawful means prior to their illegal conduct.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Diede 795 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 2011
State v. Diede 795 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 2011
Harrison v. Commissioner of Public Safety 781 N.W.2d 918 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Harrison v. Commissioner of Public Safety 781 N.W.2d 918 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
(citing Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 357-58 , 88 S.Ct.
State v. Schluter 653 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Schluter 653 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
843 (Minn.1992); review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Frank 650 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Frank 650 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
2130, 2135 , 124 L.Ed.2d 334 (1993); review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Miranda 622 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Miranda 622 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
The recognized exceptions include “(1) a search conducted incident to a lawful arrest, (2) a search conducted because of exigent circumstances, and (3) a search conducted with consent.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Thomas 598 N.W.2d 389 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Thomas 598 N.W.2d 389 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
889, 893 , 11 L.Ed.2d 856 (1964); review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Bauman 586 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Bauman 586 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(discussing state’s burden), rev’d on other grounds, (inevitable discovery exception is narrow exception), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Martinez 579 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Martinez 579 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Gray 456 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1990
State v. Gray 456 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1990
166 , 98 L.Ed.2d 120 (1987); pet.
State v. Miggler 419 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Miggler 419 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Whitcomb 413 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Whitcomb 413 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Hatton 409 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1987
State v. Hatton 409 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1987
petition for review denied (Minn.1986).
State v. Williams 409 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Williams 409 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Geer v. State 406 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Geer v. State 406 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Hatton 405 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Hatton 405 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 1987