Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Winter v. Winter, 375 N.W.2d 76.

28 citing documents.

Marriage of Darcy v. Darcy 455 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Marriage of Darcy v. Darcy 455 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Marriage of Katz v. Katz 408 N.W.2d 835 Minn. 1987
Marriage of Katz v. Katz 408 N.W.2d 835 Minn. 1987
Marriage of Murray v. Murray 405 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Murray v. Murray 405 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Another judge remanded for further consideration in accordance with the, then recent, (Minn.Ct.
Marriage of Quaid v. Quaid 403 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Quaid v. Quaid 403 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
00,000, wife’s net worth was approximately $250,000, and trust funds for children amounted to nearly $1,000,000, the trial court should determine “what amount will be necessary for the support of the children, in light of the earning capacity of the gifts and trusts already established for their benefit,” and the assets so designated should be placed in trust for their support); pet.
Marriage of Lujan v. Lujan 400 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Lujan v. Lujan 400 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Kujawa v. Kujawa 397 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Kujawa v. Kujawa 397 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
McGleno v. McGleno 393 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
McGleno v. McGleno 393 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Price v. Price 390 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Price v. Price 390 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
LeTendre v. LeTendre 388 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
LeTendre v. LeTendre 388 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
§ 518.14 (1984); -81 (Minn.Ct.App.1985), pet.
Marriage of Blomgren v. Blomgren 386 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Blomgren v. Blomgren 386 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Maxson v. Derence 384 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Maxson v. Derence 384 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Katz v. Katz 380 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Katz v. Katz 380 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Hoppenrath v. Cullen 383 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Hoppenrath v. Cullen 383 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Martin v. Martin 382 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Martin v. Martin 382 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
to each other” because this could result in “an unfair portion of the support obligation [being] shifted to the custodial parent”); (children are “entitled to enjoy the benefits of increased income of both parents”); pet.