Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Chabot v. City of Sauk Rapids, 422 N.W.2d 708.

24 citing documents.

Linda Holper v. City of Gilman Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Linda Holper v. City of Gilman Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Christopherson, d at 276 (-711 (Minn. 1998)).
Shane Feldhaus v. City of Minnetonka Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Shane Feldhaus v. City of Minnetonka Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See, 711 (Minn. 1988) (holding city’s decision not to remedy stormwater-holding pond by making costly repairs was “clearly of a policy-making nature” and immune from tort liability as a discretionary function); -77 (Minn. App. 2001) (affirming summary judgme
Brandon Grim, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Robert C. Tengdin, Trustee of the Robert C. Tengdin Revocable Trust dated May 18, 2009, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Doug Blaine v. City of Sartell, County of Stearns 865 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Doug Blaine v. City of Sartell, County of Stearns 865 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 708, 709–11 (Minn. 1988) (stating that city’s decision not to make capital improvements to existing storm sewer system was “clearly of a policy-making nature,” where “city engineer .
Christopherson v. City of Albert Lea 623 N.W.2d 272 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Christopherson v. City of Albert Lea 623 N.W.2d 272 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
As the Minnesota Supreme Court held, a “city’s decision not to remedy” a defect in its sewer system “was clearly of a policy-making nature.” -11 (Minn.1988).
614 Co. v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency 547 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
614 Co. v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency 547 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(applying only the immunity test); Guerdon Indus., d at 188 (applying only the justification test).
Sota Foods, Inc. v. Larson-Peterson & Associates, Inc. 497 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Sota Foods, Inc. v. Larson-Peterson & Associates, Inc. 497 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-11 (Minn. *281 1988) (city’s decision concerning major capital improvements to its existing drainage system involved policy-making which required a balancing of social, political, and economic considerations and was, therefore, immune as a discretionary function).
Invest Cast, Inc. v. City of Blaine 471 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Invest Cast, Inc. v. City of Blaine 471 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
3 the city had notice by means of a written report that several storm water sewers in the city were inadequate.
Imlay v. City of Lake Crystal 453 N.W.2d 326 Minn. 1990
Imlay v. City of Lake Crystal 453 N.W.2d 326 Minn. 1990
Frank's Livestock & Poultry Farm, Inc. v. City of Wells 431 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Frank's Livestock & Poultry Farm, Inc. v. City of Wells 431 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Holmquist v. State 425 N.W.2d 230 Minn. 1988
Holmquist v. State 425 N.W.2d 230 Minn. 1988
(although governmental immunity waived by procurement of liability insurance, no liability because no negligence).
Abbett v. County of St. Louis 424 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Abbett v. County of St. Louis 424 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
held that the city’s decision to not improve an existing drainage system was immune, but that the immunity was waived by the city’s purchase of liability insurance.