Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Application of Christenson, 417 N.W.2d 607.

25 citing documents.

In re: New American Development Center Appeal of MDE-NPS January through April 2022 Claims Disallowance Decision in the … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
” -12 (Minn. 1987) (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of: Petition of MCEA for Minn. 2022
Ren Xu, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See In re Application of Christenson , Bloomquist v. Comm’r of Nat.
In re Big Stone County Request for Review of Public Watercourse - Section 13, T 123 N, 46W, … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Statutory Background The State of Minnesota, through its police power, “has been defining and protecting its public water resources since 1867.” (citing Minn. Laws 1867, ch. 40).
Plocher v. Commissioner of Public Safety 681 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Plocher v. Commissioner of Public Safety 681 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
The degree of notice required does not follow one specific; technical definition and varies “with the circumstances and conditions of each case.” In re Application of Christenson for a Permit to Drain Wetland 47-219, -12 (Minn.1987).
Hentges v. Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources 638 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Hentges v. Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources 638 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
(finding that environmental laws prohibited the applicant from enlarging or draining private drainage ditches and drain a protected wetland).
Commissioner of Natural Resources v. Nicollet County Public Water/Wetlands Hearings Unit 633 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Commissioner of Natural Resources v. Nicollet County Public Water/Wetlands Hearings Unit 633 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
The degree of notice required does not follow one specific, technical definition but rather varies “with the circumstances and conditions of each case.” (citation *30 omitted).
Drum v. Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources 574 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Drum v. Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources 574 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
See Minn. Stat. § 103G.201 (1996); -11 (Minn.1987) (explaining inventory process).
McLeod County Board of Commissioners v. State, Department of Natural Resources 549 N.W.2d 630 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
McLeod County Board of Commissioners v. State, Department of Natural Resources 549 N.W.2d 630 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
The supreme court has stated that Aldo Leopold’s “‘land ethic simply enlarges the boundaries of the community to include * * * the land.’ ” (quoting Bryson, 309 Minn. at 189 , d at 322 ).
Central Baptist Theological Seminary v. City of New Brighton 487 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Central Baptist Theological Seminary v. City of New Brighton 487 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
See (recognizing possible application of non-conforming use doctrine to a riparian par *531 ty); Pratt, d at 772 n. 6 (recognizing when a riparian owner may exclude others from public waters).
State v. Ohrtman 466 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Ohrtman 466 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Application of Christenson
Matter of Eigenheer 453 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Matter of Eigenheer 453 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Smith v. City of Owatonna 450 N.W.2d 309 Minn. 1990
Smith v. City of Owatonna 450 N.W.2d 309 Minn. 1990
St. Paul Companies, Inc. v. Hatch 449 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1989
St. Paul Companies, Inc. v. Hatch 449 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1989
see also Housing & Redevelopment Auth.
State v. Sorenson 430 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1988