Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Fenney, 448 N.W.2d 54.

51 citing documents.

Wayne v. State 912 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 2018
Wayne v. State 912 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 2018
State v. Fenney ( Wayne I ), , 62 (Minn. 1989).
Wheeler v. State 909 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2018
Wheeler v. State 909 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2018
See State v. Rainer , 258 Minn. 168 , , 395-96 (1960) (noting that dicta in a Minnesota Supreme Court case "should not be lightly disregarded[,]" particularly when it is "an expression of opinion on a question directly involved and argued by counsel though not entirely necessary to the decision"); see, e.g. , State v. Fenney , , 58 & n.1 (Minn. 1989) (considering dicta from our prior opinions when addressing an issue of first impression).
State of Minnesota v. Chad Michael Nowacki 880 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Chad Michael Nowacki 880 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
4 It is well established that the “results of polygraph tests, as well as evidence that a defendant took or refused to take such a test, are not admissible in Minnesota in either criminal or civil trials.” -27 (Minn. App. 2009), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Michael Wayne v. State of Minnesota 870 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 2015
Michael Wayne v. State of Minnesota 870 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 2015
State v. Fenney (Wayne I), (consolidated direct and postconviction appeals).1 Since Wayne I, Wayne has filed six other postconviction petitions, none of which warranted relief.
Michael Wayne v. State of Minnesota 866 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 2015
Michael Wayne v. State of Minnesota 866 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 2015
State v. Fenney (Wayne I), (consolidated direct and postconviction appeals).2 Wayne subsequently filed four petitions for postconviction relief, as well as a motion for postconviction DNA testing under Minn. Stat. § 590.01, subd.
Michael Wayne v. State of Minnesota 860 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 2015
Michael Wayne v. State of Minnesota 860 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 2015
State v. Fenney (Wayne I), (consolidated direct and postconviction appeals).1 Wayne filed four petitions for postconviction relief, as well as a motion for postconviction DNA testing under Minn. Stat. § 590.01, subd.
Wayne v. State 832 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 2013
Wayne v. State 832 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 2013
State v. Dixon 822 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Dixon 822 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
for the proposition that when the test at issue is used mainly in connection with forensics, forensics is the relevant field and those actually involved with performing the involved test constitute the relevant experts in the field for purposes of the Frye analysis.
State v. Dressel 765 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Dressel 765 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1, 12-13 , -62 (Minn.1989) (holding that admission of reference to polygraph was harmless error).
State v. Green 747 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 2008
State v. Green 747 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 2008
Wayne v. State 747 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 2008
Wayne v. State 747 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 2008
State v. Fenney (Wayne I)
State v. Winter 668 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Winter 668 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(establishing as exception to rule that defendant has a right to present polygraph information as part of circumstances surrounding a confession).
State v. Traylor 656 N.W.2d 885 Minn. 2003
State v. Traylor 656 N.W.2d 885 Minn. 2003
Goeb v. Tharaldson 615 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 2000
Goeb v. Tharaldson 615 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 2000
Wayne v. State 601 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1999
Wayne v. State 601 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1999
State v. Flores 595 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 1999
State v. Flores 595 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 1999
State v. Ashby 567 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1997
State v. Ashby 567 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1997
State v. Spears 560 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Spears 560 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(providing for de novo review of questions of law); (recognizing statutory construction is legal issue).
State v. Harris 560 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 1997
State v. Harris 560 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 1997
State v. Klawitter 518 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 1994
Wayne v. State 498 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1993
Wayne v. State 498 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1993
State v. Jobe 486 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1992
State v. Jobe 486 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1992
State v. Pilcher 472 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1991
State v. Pilcher 472 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1991
61 (Minn.1989) (victim found with intimate parts exposed).
State v. Kraushaar 459 N.W.2d 346 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Kraushaar 459 N.W.2d 346 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
(electrophoretic blood type comparisons performed and checked pursuant to protocol).
State v. Moore 458 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1990
State v. Moore 458 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1990
State v. Schaeffer 452 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1990