Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Forcier, 420 N.W.2d 884.

42 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(stating that an erroneously admitted confession is harmless if “the admission of the statement did not have a substantial or significant impact on the verdict” beyond a reasonable doubt (emphasis omitted)).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
12 (Minn. 1998); n.1 (Minn. 1988) (courts presume jurors follow a judge’s instruction.).
Paul Omol Arkangelo Uchodu, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See State v. Forcier , n.1 9 (Minn. 1988) (noting courts presume juries follow instructions they are given).
Williams v. Smith 820 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 2012
Williams v. Smith 820 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 2012
State v. McCurry 770 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. McCurry 770 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
885 n. 1 (Minn.1988) (stating presumption apparently for first time in Minnesota, and relying on contemporaneous U.S. Supreme Court discussion of question).
State v. Ferguson 581 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1998
State v. Ferguson 581 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1998
State v. Shoen 578 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1998
State v. Shoen 578 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1998
State v. Miller 573 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1998
State v. Miller 573 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1998
State v. Marin 541 N.W.2d 370 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Marin 541 N.W.2d 370 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(requiring the court’s satisfaction beyond a reasonable doubt that admission of a statement “did not have a substantial or significant impact on the verdict”); -91 (Minn.App.1995) (finding error involving a critical identification issue was not harmless).
State v. James 520 N.W.2d 399 Minn. 1994
State v. James 520 N.W.2d 399 Minn. 1994
State v. VanWagner 504 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1993
State v. VanWagner 504 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1993
State v. Walsh 495 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 1993
State v. Walsh 495 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 1993
State v. Jobe 486 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1992
State v. Jobe 486 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1992
State v. Hookom 474 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Hookom 474 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Glidden 455 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1990
State v. Glidden 455 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1990
State v. Conklin 444 N.W.2d 268 Minn. 1989
State v. Shoop 441 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1989
State v. Shoop 441 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1989
State v. Thieman 439 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1989
State v. Thieman 439 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1989
-87 (Minn.1988) (applicable harmless error standard).
State v. Warndahl 436 N.W.2d 770 Minn. 1989
State v. Warndahl 436 N.W.2d 770 Minn. 1989
State v. Olson 436 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1989
State v. Olson 436 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1989
State v. Buchanan 431 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1988
State v. Buchanan 431 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1988
State v. Robinson 427 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 1988
State v. Robinson 427 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 1988
-87 (Minn.1988); Howard, d at 221-23 .