Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., 426 N.W.2d 419.

125 citing documents.

Great West Casualty Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 590 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Great West Casualty Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 590 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Silva v. Maplewood Care Center 582 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 1998
EEC Property Co. v. Kaplan 578 N.W.2d 381 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
EEC Property Co. v. Kaplan 578 N.W.2d 381 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Co., ) (contract); Children’s Hosp.
Hippe v. American Family Insurance Co. 565 N.W.2d 439 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Hippe v. American Family Insurance Co. 565 N.W.2d 439 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Minnesota Community College Faculty Ass'n v. State 562 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Minnesota Community College Faculty Ass'n v. State 562 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Arbitration Between Thomas v. Western National Insurance Group 562 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 1997
Arbitration Between Thomas v. Western National Insurance Group 562 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 1997
Lahr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 551 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Lahr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 551 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Co., do not address the situation here, where a passenger is pursuing UIM benefits against her driver’s insurer based on the other vehicle being underinsured.
Arbitration Between Raymond v. Allied Property & Casualty Insurance 546 N.W.2d 766 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Arbitration Between Raymond v. Allied Property & Casualty Insurance 546 N.W.2d 766 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Thomas v. Western National Insurance Group 543 N.W.2d 712 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Thomas v. Western National Insurance Group 543 N.W.2d 712 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Ins., (“in the area of automobile reparation, arbitrators are limited to deciding issues of fact, leaving the interpretation of the law to the courts”).
Dean v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 535 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1995
Dean v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 535 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1995
AMCO Insurance v. Ashwood-Ames 534 N.W.2d 740 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
AMCO Insurance v. Ashwood-Ames 534 N.W.2d 740 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Independent School District No. 279 v. Winkelman Building Corp. 530 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Independent School District No. 279 v. Winkelman Building Corp. 530 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Neal v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. 529 N.W.2d 330 Minn. 1995
Neal v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. 529 N.W.2d 330 Minn. 1995
Ray v. City of Maple Grove 519 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Ray v. City of Maple Grove 519 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Ins., , 422 n. 1 (Minn.1988) (“[Ujnder the current statute, an insurer must receive credit against the limits of underinsured motorist coverage for any amount previously paid to the injured party.”) (emphasis added) (citing Minn.Stat.
Neal v. State Farm Insurance Co. 509 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Neal v. State Farm Insurance Co. 509 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Great West Casualty Co. v. Kroning 511 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Great West Casualty Co. v. Kroning 511 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Rodgers v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co. 499 N.W.2d 61 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Rodgers v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co. 499 N.W.2d 61 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. National Chiropractic Mutual Insurance Co. 496 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. National Chiropractic Mutual Insurance Co. 496 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Employers Mutual Companies v. Nordstrom 495 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1993
Employers Mutual Companies v. Nordstrom 495 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1993
Co., we said: Underinsured motorist coverage is not an alternative to liability coverage.
Schoenborn v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. 495 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Schoenborn v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. 495 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Co., the court limited the arbitrator’s role in automobile insurance disputes as follows: We think that consistency mandates that the courts interpret the no-fault-statutes, not various panels of arbitrators.
New Creative Enterprises, Inc. v. Dick Hume & Associates, Inc. 494 N.W.2d 508 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
New Creative Enterprises, Inc. v. Dick Hume & Associates, Inc. 494 N.W.2d 508 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Co., (doctrine that arbitrator is final judge of both law and fact works well in context of labor collective bargaining agreement but not in no-fault automobile insurance context).
Eide v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 492 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Eide v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 492 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Junker v. Allstate Insurance Co. 489 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Junker v. Allstate Insurance Co. 489 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Barneson v. Western National Mutual Insurance 486 N.W.2d 176 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Barneson v. Western National Mutual Insurance 486 N.W.2d 176 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Arbitration of Keim v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co. 482 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Arbitration of Keim v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co. 482 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Ins., (courts, not arbitrators, interpret the no-fault statute).
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Harvey 474 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1991

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by