Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp., 461 N.W.2d 374.

115 citing documents.

Farmer's State Bank of Darwin v. Swisher 631 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 2001
Farmer's State Bank of Darwin v. Swisher 631 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 2001
to determine whether Swisher proved the exception to the general rule prohibiting double recovery unless her claims were “different in kind.” The court determined that Swisher did not meet her burden of proof because the facts were “common to all Counts against both tort-feasors” and “Swisher did not
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 622 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 622 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Berreman v. West Publishing Co. 615 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Berreman v. West Publishing Co. 615 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Rudebeck v. Paulson 612 N.W.2d 450 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Rudebeck v. Paulson 612 N.W.2d 450 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Wallin v. Minnesota Department of Corrections 598 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Wallin v. Minnesota Department of Corrections 598 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Vaughn v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 558 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1997
Vaughn v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 558 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1997
The couid; to conclude that the MHRA did not preempt Vaughn’s negligence claim, which is based on “age-old” duties of common carriers.
Williams v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center, Inc. 551 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 1996
Williams v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center, Inc. 551 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 1996
the plaintiff was authorized to maintain a sexual harassment action under the Human Rights Act and a parallel action for common law battery arising from the same facts, we so held because these separate causes of action require different elements of proof and address different injuries.
Vaughn v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 546 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Vaughn v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 546 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
the Minnesota Supreme Court addressed whether an employee can maintain against her employer both a statutory cause of action for sexual harassment under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA) and a common law cause of action for battery, when both claims arise from the same set of operative facts.
Cox v. Crown CoCo, Inc. 544 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Cox v. Crown CoCo, Inc. 544 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
om may have had a proper purpose in seeking to protect other employees and possibly had a proper occasion immediately after her tires were slashed, Lindstrom and Crown CoCo are not entitled to a qualified privilege unless they had “reasonable or probable grounds for believing in the validity of the statement, even though hindsight might show the statement to be false.” (holding employer ineligible for qualified privilege, because it had taken no steps to investigate before publicly accusing empl
Williams v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center, Inc. 530 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Elstrom v. Independent School District No. 270 533 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Elstrom v. Independent School District No. 270 533 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Smits v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 525 N.W.2d 554 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Smits v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 525 N.W.2d 554 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(employer must first investigate circumstances and uncover sufficient evidence to establish probable cause).
Plate v. St. Mary's Help of Christians Church 520 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Plate v. St. Mary's Help of Christians Church 520 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. City of Mounds View 518 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1994
State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. City of Mounds View 518 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1994
Dorn v. Peterson 512 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Dorn v. Peterson 512 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See, e.g., Frankson, d at 144 (distribution of letter to personnel file and to two officers qualifiedly privileged); -80 (Minn.1990) (statements at meeting of employees about theft allegations against an employee qualifiedly privileged).
Bauer v. State 511 N.W.2d 447 Minn. 1994
Bauer v. State 511 N.W.2d 447 Minn. 1994
Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co., -57 (Minn.1980); -81 (Minn.1990).
Redalen v. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Co. 504 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Bougie v. Sibley Manor, Inc. 504 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Redalen v. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Co. 504 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Bougie v. Sibley Manor, Inc. 504 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
McGrath v. TCF Bank Savings, FSB 502 N.W.2d 801 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
McGrath v. TCF Bank Savings, FSB 502 N.W.2d 801 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Rosenbloom v. Flygare 501 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 1993
Rosenbloom v. Flygare 501 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 1993
in which this court held that separate causes of action lie for common law battery and for sexual harassment in violation of the MHRA.
Hanks v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. 493 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Hanks v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. 493 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Gillson v. State Department of Natural Resources 492 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Gillson v. State Department of Natural Resources 492 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Rosenbloom v. Flygare 487 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Rosenbloom v. Flygare 487 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Goodhue State Bank v. Luhman 490 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Goodhue State Bank v. Luhman 490 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Kay v. Peter Motor Co., Inc. 483 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Kay v. Peter Motor Co., Inc. 483 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Mrozka v. Archdiocese of St. Paul & Mpls. 482 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1992