Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Rosse, 478 N.W.2d 482.

41 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Shane Todd Orth, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Police may make a Terry stop to investigate a past felony crime based on a police bulletin, provided that the bulletin was “issued on the basis of articulable facts supporting a reasonable suspicion.” United States v. Hensley, 4 69 U.S. 221, 232 (1985)
Brian John Blawat, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Nichols argues that other cases support a finding of custody, in which the supreme court concluded that a defendant was in custody despite later being told she was free to go when, prior to being questioned by law enforcement, law enforcement blocked the defendant’s car, multiple officers approached the defendant’s car with t heir guns drawn, the defendant
State of Minnesota v. Erik John Heinonen 889 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Welfare of: L. S. H., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of: L. S. H., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See id.; (concluding that appellant was in custody in part because of presence of seven officers).
State of Minnesota v. Jimmy Lee Morris Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jimmy Lee Morris Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Subsequent [United States Supreme Court] decisions have narrowed this language.”
State v. Scruggs 822 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 2012
State v. Scruggs 822 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 2012
(concluding that a Miranda warning should have been given looking at the record as a whole, including the presence of seven police officers).
State v. Flowers 788 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 2010
State v. Flowers 788 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 2010
1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)
In Re the Welfare of D.S.M. 710 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Welfare of D.S.M. 710 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Staats 658 N.W.2d 207 Minn. 2003
State v. Staats 658 N.W.2d 207 Minn. 2003
See Wiernasz, d at 3-4 ; Champion, d at 43
State v. Olson 634 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Olson 634 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Wiernasz 584 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1998
State v. Wiernasz 584 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1998
The court of appeals, citing as its authoi’ agreed with the trial court and affirmed the suppression order.
State v. Sirvio 579 N.W.2d 478 Minn. 1998
State v. Sirvio 579 N.W.2d 478 Minn. 1998
State v. Miller 573 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1998
State v. Miller 573 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1998
( (further citations omitted)).
State v. Malik 552 N.W.2d 730 Minn. 1996
State v. Malik 552 N.W.2d 730 Minn. 1996
The court reasoned that “Malik was subject to only a routine traffic stop when he admitted there was marijuana in the car.”
State v. Hince 540 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1995
State v. Hince 540 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1995
State v. Champion 533 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1995
State v. Champion 533 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1995
(citing Berkemer, 468 U.S. at 442 , 104 S.Ct.
In Re the Welfare of M.E.P. 523 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In Re the Welfare of M.E.P. 523 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
The juveniles were “being restrained to a degree associated with a formal arrest.”
State v. Champion 517 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Champion 517 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. VanWagner 504 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1993
State v. VanWagner 504 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1993
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 444 , 86 S.Ct.
State v. Walsh 495 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 1993
State v. Walsh 495 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 1993
State v. Voigt 486 N.W.2d 793 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Voigt 486 N.W.2d 793 Minn. Ct. App. 1992