Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. O'HAGAN, 474 N.W.2d 613.

36 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
19, 2005); see also State v. O’Hagan, -19 (Minn. App. 1991) (affirming conviction of theft by temporary control of attorney who used trust assets for personal purposes but later replenished trust accounts), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See, e.g., State v. O’Hagan, (concluding no unity of time and place where theft through multiple diversions of funds occurred seven weeks apart and two-and-a-half months apart), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State v. Ivy 902 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Ivy 902 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(stating that impermissible double-counting arises when the defendant is convicted of and sentenced for multiple counts and the district court uses the conduct underlying one count to support the aggravated factor on another count); see also State v. O’Hagan, (Minn.App.
State v. Washington 894 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Washington 894 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
see also State v. O’Hagan, review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Nathan Charles Robert Schwartz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Nathan Charles Robert Schwartz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, d 469, 472 (Minn. 1997); State v. O’Hagan, review denied (Minn. Sept.
State v. Franklin 692 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Franklin 692 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. O’Hagan, -19 (Minn.App.1991), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State v. Heath 685 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Heath 685 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. O’Hagan, review denied (Minn. Sept.
Citizens for a Safe Grant v. Lone Oak Sportsmen's Club, Inc. 624 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Citizens for a Safe Grant v. Lone Oak Sportsmen's Club, Inc. 624 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
20, 1998); see also State v. O’Hagan, (concealing or possessing stolen property is a continuing offense for the purposes of the statute of limitations), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State v. Woelfel 621 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Woelfel 621 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
See also State v. O’Hagan, -24 (Minn.App.1991) (upward durational and dispositional departure from presumptive guidelines sentence appropriate where conduct constitutes major economic offense and aggravating factors exist), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State v. Larson 605 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2000
State v. Larson 605 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2000
Ann. § 609.52 & Advisory Committee Comments therein; see also State v. O’Hagan, rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State v. Danforth 573 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Danforth 573 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See State v. O’Hagan, (“Refusal to give a proposed jury instruction lies within the .discretion of the trial court and there is no error absent an abuse of discretion.”), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State v. Butterfield 555 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Butterfield 555 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
“If section 609.035 applies, multiple sentencing is prohibited, including the imposition of concurrent sentences.” State v. O’Hagan, review denied (Minn. Sept.
State v. Martinez 530 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Greiner 518 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Greiner 518 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Jaworsky 505 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Jaworsky 505 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Jones 498 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Jones 498 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Rachuy 495 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Rachuy 495 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Patterson 493 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Patterson 493 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
“Refusal to give a proposed jury instruction lies within the discretion of the trial court and there is no error absent an abuse of discretion.” State v. O’Hagan, pet.
Dang v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Dang v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Co., 312 Minn. 324, 340 , (special verdict form); State v. O’Hagan, pet.