Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Maeder v. Maeder, 480 N.W.2d 677.

24 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Brenda Lee Christiansen v. Timothy Nels Christiansen, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Brenda Lee Christiansen v. Timothy Nels Christiansen, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(affirming district court’s order to secure maintenance with life insurance because there was no abuse of discretion), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
In re the Marriage of: Larry Allan Keeler, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(affirming district court’s order to secure maintenance with life insurance because there was no abuse of discretion), review denied (Minn. Mar.
In re the Marriage of: Bijoy Raghavan, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Paul Grant Gardner v. Margaret Rose Gardner Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Paul Grant Gardner v. Margaret Rose Gardner Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Citing Maeder v. Maeder, husband argues that he “has the right to demand the support payments be covered with insurance on [wife’s] person.” review denied (Minn. Mar.
In re the Marriage of: Holly v. Anderson v. Derrik T. Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Holly v. Anderson v. Derrik T. Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The [district] court has discretion to determine whether the circumstances justifying an award of maintenance also justify securing it with life insurance.” d 677, 680 (Minn. App. 1992) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Mar.
Marriage of Kampf v. Kampf 732 N.W.2d 630 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of Kampf v. Kampf 732 N.W.2d 630 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
-80 (Minn.App.1992), review denied (Minn. Mar.
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 621 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 621 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
review denied (Minn. Mar.
Walker v. Walker 553 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Walker v. Walker 553 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
review denied (Minn. Mar.
Marriage of Hecker v. Hecker 543 N.W.2d 678 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of Hecker v. Hecker 543 N.W.2d 678 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
-24 (Minn.App.1992) (affirming modification where recipient "maximized her income”); (rejecting claim that recipient refused to rehabilitate), review denied (Minn. March 19, 1992); (affirming extension of temporary maintenance to permanent maintenance where recipient had "not been able” to become self-supporting); Sand v. Sand, 379
Marriage of Allan v. Allan 509 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Allan v. Allan 509 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
680 (Minn.App.1992) (affirming district court’s finding that respondent’s reasonable expenses were less than claimed expenses), pet.
Bock v. Bock 506 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Bock v. Bock 506 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage Of: Wopata v. Wopata 498 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage Of: Wopata v. Wopata 498 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Gessner v. Gessner 487 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Marriage of Gessner v. Gessner 487 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1992

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by