Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kaiser v. Memorial Blood Center of Minneapolis, Inc., 486 N.W.2d 762.

32 citing documents.

Anjela Carpenter v. Meridian Behavioral Health LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Minneapolis 6 Inc., (distinguishing “malpractice by professionals acting pursuant to their professional licensure from negligence based upon conduct for which a professional license is not required”).
Dennis J. Daulton, trustee for the next of kin of Brady Joel Daulton, deceased v. TMS Treatment Center, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Dennis J. Daulton, trustee for the next of kin of Brady Joel Daulton, deceased v. TMS Treatment Center, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
of Minneapolis, Inc., (explaining that bloods banks were not like the enumerated institutions because they were not “primarily in-patient, comprehensive health care facilities”).
State v. Eide 898 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Eide 898 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Minn. Stat. § 645.08 (3) (2016) (codifying the principle of ejusdem generis by requiring that “[gjeneral words are construed to" be restricted in their méaning by preceding particular words”).
Allen v. Hennepin County 680 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Anderson v. Anoka Hennepin Independent School District 11 678 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 2004
Anderson v. Anoka Hennepin Independent School District 11 678 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 2004
(citing Northernaire Productions, Inc. v. County of Crow Wing, 309 Minn. 386, 390 , aff ''d, Koderick v. Snyder Brothers Drug, Inc., overruled by Kaiser v. Memorial Blood Center of Minneapolis, Inc., ).
D.M.S. v. Barber 645 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 2002
D.M.S. v. Barber 645 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 2002
D.M.S. v. Barber 627 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
D.M.S. v. Barber 627 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Blatz v. Allina Health System 622 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Blatz v. Allina Health System 622 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Henderson v. Allina Health System 609 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Henderson v. Allina Health System 609 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(holding that blood bank not covered by two-year statute because its physicians did not administer tainted blood in connection with their professional licensure) with Paulos, d at 320 (holding physician’s fraudulent misrepresentations made as precursor to reconstructive surgery subject to two
Paulos v. Johnson 597 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Paulos v. Johnson 597 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(Randall, J., concurring specially), review denied (Minn. Nov.
D.A.B. v. Brown 570 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
D.A.B. v. Brown 570 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(concluding applicable statute of *171 limitations hinged on whether complained of action was taken pursuant to professional licensure or based on conduct for which licen-sure not required).
Femrite v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital 568 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Femrite v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital 568 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
To ascertain whether the two-year statute of limitations applies, one must determine whether the action is included among those listed in the two-year statute of limitations for “malpractice, error, mistake, or failure to cure.” (quoting Minn. Stat. § 541.07 (1)).
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. Boyne 563 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. Boyne 563 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
of Minneapolis, Inc., (quoting Francis J. McCaffrey, Statutory Construction § 16, at 41 (1953)); see also Minn.Stat.
Maloney v. Dakota County Receiving Center, Inc. 560 N.W.2d 402 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Maloney v. Dakota County Receiving Center, Inc. 560 N.W.2d 402 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
M.L. v. Magnuson 531 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
M.L. v. Magnuson 531 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
1, was applicable to M.L.’s respondeat superior claim, (statute of limitation for respon-deat superior claims ordinarily same as the underlying cause of action), and that period had expired by the time M.L.
Oelschlager v. Magnuson 528 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Oelschlager v. Magnuson 528 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Pletan v. Gaines 494 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 1992
Pletan v. Gaines 494 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 1992
See, e.g., Northernaire Productions, Inc. v. County of Crow Wing, 309 Minn. 386, 390 , aff' d, Roderick v. Snyder Brothers Drug, Inc., overruled by Kaiser v. Memorial Blood Center of Minneapolis, Inc.