Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ford, 539 N.W.2d 214.

155 citing documents.

  • State v. Clifton 701 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 2005
  • State v. DeRosier 695 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 2005
  • State v. DeRosier 695 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 2005
  • A.C. Ford v. State 690 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2005
  • A.C. Ford v. State 690 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2005
  • State v. Wright 686 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Wright 686 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Lee 683 N.W.2d 309 Minn. 2004
  • State v. Lee 683 N.W.2d 309 Minn. 2004
    § 634-.04 (2002); 2 (stating that “a criminal conviction may not be based upon the testimony of an accomplice unless it is corroborated by other evidence that tends to convict the defendant of the offense.”).
  • State v. Smith 669 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 2003
  • State v. Smith 669 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 2003
  • Finne v. State 648 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • Finne v. State 648 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    To be suppressed, this court must examine the “egregiousness of the government’s action in total.”
  • Townsend v. State 646 N.W.2d 218 Minn. 2002
  • Townsend v. State 646 N.W.2d 218 Minn. 2002
    We quoted cases stating that: “Harmless beyond a reasonable doubt” does not mean there must be absolutely no doubt of guilt, rather it means that the weight of all the other evidence is such that it “justifies the verdict regardless of the erroneous admission * * *.” cert.
  • Ferguson v. State 645 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 2002
  • Ferguson v. State 645 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 2002
  • State v. Myers 627 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 2001
  • State v. Myers 627 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 2001
  • State v. Stewart 624 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 2001
  • State v. Stewart 624 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 2001
  • Burns v. State 621 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • Burns v. State 621 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Johnson 616 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 2000
  • State v. Tovar 605 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 2000
  • State v. Tovar 605 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 2000
    VI; (holding that invocation of the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination establishes unavailability under Minn. R. Evid.
  • State v. Franklin 604 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2000
  • State v. Franklin 604 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2000
  • State v. Miller 600 N.W.2d 457 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Miller 600 N.W.2d 457 Minn. 1999
    at 138-39 ( , 801 n. 6 (Minn.1992) cert.
  • State v. Cole 594 N.W.2d 197 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Miller 586 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Miller 586 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Keeton 589 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Keeton 589 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Hough 585 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Hough 585 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1998
    See, (upholding attempted murder conviction using transferred intent when the intended victim died but the unintended victim did not); (applying transferred intent to affirm conviction of defendant who intended to shoot at a bar patron, but missed and killed a
  • State v. Aubid 578 N.W.2d 784 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • State v. Aubid 578 N.W.2d 784 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
    (holding that only self-inculpatory aspects of hearsay statement, but not other parts of statement, are admissible under exception for statements against penal interest).
  • State v. Colsch 579 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • State v. Colsch 579 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
    3 (order for restitution does not bar any civil action by victim); (record of economic loss is required before district court may order restitution); (remanding for reconsideration of $10,000 restitution judgment for evidence of economic loss).
  • State v. Hough 571 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • State v. Hough 571 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
    (affirming attempted-murder conviction for bystander struck by bullet intended for murdered police officer); Merrill, d at 323 (applying doctrine of transferred intent *583 to unborn child victim of mother’s death); Livingston, d at 229-30 (rejecting argument that transferred intent
  • State v. Behl 573 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • State v. Behl 573 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • State v. Willis 559 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Willis 559 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Jones 556 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1996
  • State v. Jones 556 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1996
    this court concluded that a trial court erred in admitting a statement that was non-self-inculpatory, but contained within it a largely self-inculpatory narrative.
  • State v. Townsend 546 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1996