Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Butcher, 563 N.W.2d 776.

147 citing documents.

In the Matter of: Patricia Speece v. Daniel Pinkerton Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Aug.
Sadik Abdikadir Yusuf v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sadik Abdikadir Yusuf v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Mario Gonzalez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Mario Gonzalez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The test to apply when the offenses include both intentional and unintentional crimes is “whether the offenses arose out of a continuing and uninterrupted course of conduct, manifesting an indivisible state of mind or coincident errors of judgment.” d 776, 784 (Minn. App. 1997) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Stephanie JoNell Guscette Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Stephanie JoNell Guscette Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Patrick James Kissner Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Patrick James Kissner Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that issues not briefed on appeal are waived), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Jacob Daniel Hughes Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Joseph Dixon v. Avarto Digital Services NetZero Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jacob Daniel Hughes Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Aug.
Joseph Dixon v. Avarto Digital Services NetZero Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Michael Lee Everly Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Michael Lee Everly Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Roosevelt Hunter Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Roosevelt Hunter Minn. Ct. App. 2014
attributed to errors in judgment wholly independent of his decision to drink and drive.”); -60 (Minn. App. 2000) (holding that DWI and driving with expired tabs do not manifest an indivisible state of mind or coincident errors of judgment because driving with expired tabs is a continuing offense that occurs whenever the defendant drives); (holding in relevant part that transporting an uncased firearm and driving after cancellation, both of which occurred in a single time frame, did not share an
State of Minnesota v. Dontrell Dyna Flowers Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Dontrell Dyna Flowers Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that issues not briefed on appeal are waived), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Broten 836 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Hicks 837 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Broten 836 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Hicks 837 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
(stating that issues not adequately briefed on appeal are waived), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Larson v. State 801 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Larson v. State 801 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
review denied (Minn. Aug.
Campos v. State 798 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Campos v. State 798 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
(stating that appellate courts will generally not consider matters not argued to and considered by the district court); (stating that issues not briefed on appeal are waived), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Moen 752 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Moen 752 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
(holding that issues not briefed on appeal are waived), review denied (Aug.
State v. Edwards 736 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Edwards 736 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Boehl 726 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Boehl 726 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
*836 review denied, (Minn. Aug.
State v. Meldrum 724 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Meldrum 724 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
-81 (Minn.App.1997), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Levie 695 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Levie 695 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Babcock 685 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Babcock 685 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(stating issues not briefed on appeal are waived), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Tracy 667 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Tracy 667 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(issues not briefed on appeal are waived); review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Marchbanks 632 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Marchbanks 632 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
review *732 denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Reimer 625 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Reimer 625 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Taylor 594 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Taylor 594 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
1(b) (1998) (defining offense of deer shining to exclude shining while possessing *536 unloaded firearm that is “in a gun case expressly made to contain a firearm” and in closed trunk of vehicle); (noting defendant convicted of deer shining had one “partially cased rifle” and one “partially uncased gun” in his vehicle); .