Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Modern Recycling, Inc., 558 N.W.2d 770.

208 citing documents.

Balasuriya v. Bemel 617 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Balasuriya v. Bemel 617 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
See State v. Modern Recycling, Inc., (assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by argument or authority is waived).
Stephens v. Board of Regents of University of Minnesota 614 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Stephens v. Board of Regents of University of Minnesota 614 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
1(d); Wintz Parcel Drivers, d at 480; Whalen, d at 282 ; State v. Modern Recycling, Inc., (declining to address issue unsupported by legal analysis).
Whalen Ex Rel. Whalen v. Whalen 594 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Wilson 594 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Wilson 594 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Modern Recycling, Inc., (quoting Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519-20 , , 135 (1971)); review denied (Minn. Jan.
Whalen Ex Rel. Whalen v. Whalen 594 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
See State v. Modern Recycling, Inc., (assignment of error in brief based on “mere assertion” and not supported by argument or authority is waived unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection (citation omitted)).