Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Lynch, 590 N.W.2d 75.
-
State v. Broulik
606 N.W.2d 64
Minn. 2000
(using the standard cautionary instructions “assured that the jury did not give improper weight to the evidence”); (explaining that CRIMJIGs 2.01 and 3.16 lessen ‘the probability of undue weight being given by the jury to the evidence”).
- State v. Robinson 604 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2000
- State v. Robinson 604 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2000
- State v. Reckinger 603 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- State v. Reckinger 603 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- Sanderson v. State 601 N.W.2d 219 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
Sanderson v. State
601 N.W.2d 219
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(holding these instructions allow the jury to give proper weight to Spreigl evidence); (holding they are “recommended in-structionfs]” to be given concerning evidence of other bad acts).