Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Thomas, 590 N.W.2d 755.
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Kent Randall Meyer Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
State of Minnesota v. Kent Randall Meyer
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“The verdict will be upheld if the fact finder, giving due regard to the presumption of innocence and to the state’s burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, could reasonably have found the defendant guilty of the offense charged.” -58 (Minn. 1999).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(addressing ineffective-assistance claim on direct appeal when record was clear).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“The verdict will be upheld if the fact finder, giving due regard to the presumption of innocence and to the state’s burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, could reasonably have fo und the defendant gu ilty of the offense charged.” -58 (Minn. 1999).
- State of Minnesota v. Rudolph Gordon Cooper Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Rudolph Gordon Cooper
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that “[appellate courts] will not consider any claim lacking supporting argument or authority unless prejudicial error appears obvious upon inspection of the record” (quotation omitted)).
- State of Minnesota v. Sunil Vidyadhar Sapatnekar Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Sunil Vidyadhar Sapatnekar Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Ricky Harry Gruber 864 N.W.2d 628 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Ricky Harry Gruber 864 N.W.2d 628 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Sherwin Jerome Thurman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Sherwin Jerome Thurman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State v. Bahtuoh 840 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 2013
- State v. Bahtuoh 840 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 2013
- State v. Hurd 819 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 2012
-
State v. Hurd
819 N.W.2d 591
Minn. 2012
nding that “[t]he fact that appellant was more concerned with escape than with helping the victim, and that appellant appeared to have a plan of escape, may be used to infer premeditation”); Voorhees, d at 253 (finding sufficient evidence of premeditation in part because the defendant left the victim “lying on the ground to die” while waiting 2 hours before calling 911); (finding sufficient evidence of premeditation *602 when the victim died of dehydration because the defendant “made a conscious
- State v. Fleck 763 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
- State v. Fleck 763 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
- State v. Ouellette 740 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Ouellette 740 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Engle 731 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Engle 731 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. White 684 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 2004
- State v. White 684 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 2004
- State v. Lopez-Rios 669 N.W.2d 603 Minn. 2003
-
State v. Lopez-Rios
669 N.W.2d 603
Minn. 2003
In reviewing the record, we view “the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and assume[] that the fact-finder disbelieved any testimony conflicting with the result reached.”
- State v. Chomnarith 654 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 2003
- State v. Chomnarith 654 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 2003
- Burns v. State 621 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
Burns v. State
621 N.W.2d 55
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(holding waiver of right to testify was knowing and voluntary when defendant acknowledged on the record that his attorney had advised him of advantages and disadvantages of testifying and that it was his decision not to testify).
- State v. Hofer 614 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Hofer 614 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 2000