Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota, 624 N.W.2d 264.

199 citing documents.

Sauk Centre Education Ass'n v. Seagren 741 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission 731 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission 731 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In re Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn.
In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater 731 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 2007
In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater 731 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 2007
This broader definition of an agency’s “own regulation” is supported by our recent decision in In re Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn. (BCBSM), in which we gave deference to the Minnesota Department of Commerce’s determination that Blue Cross and Blue Shield’s proposal to bring its excess surplus into compliance with the law did not satisfy the requirements of Minn.Stat.
In Re Appeal of Staley 730 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re Appeal of Staley 730 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In re Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn.
In Re the Claim for Benefits by Hagert 730 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Claim for Benefits by Hagert 730 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
§ 14.69 (2006); In re Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn., Health-Partners, review denied (Minn. Mar.
Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Services, Inc. 726 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Services, Inc. 726 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
An appellate court will “defer to an agency’s conclusions regarding conflicts in testimony, the weight given to expert testimony and the inferences to be drawn from testimony.” In re Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn.
Fine v. Bernstein 726 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Fine v. Bernstein 726 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In re Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn.
In Re the Claim for Benefits by Meuleners 725 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Claim for Benefits by Meuleners 725 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In re Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn.
In Re the Appeal of the Exclusion of Molnar 720 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Appeal of the Exclusion of Molnar 720 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In re Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn.
In Re the Class a License of North Metro Harness, Inc. 711 N.W.2d 129 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Class a License of North Metro Harness, Inc. 711 N.W.2d 129 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In re Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn., (citations omitted).
Independent School District No. 709 v. Bonney 705 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Independent School District No. 709 v. Bonney 705 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
ANALYSIS “When reviewing agency decisions we adhere to the fundamental concept that decisions of administrative agencies enjoy a presumption of correctness, and deference should be shown by courts to the agencies’ expertise and their special knowledge in the field of their technical training, education, and experience.” In re Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn., (quotation omitted).
Bloomquist v. Commissioner of Natural Resources 704 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Bloomquist v. Commissioner of Natural Resources 704 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In re Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn., see also In re Am.
Sweet v. Commissioner of Human Services 702 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Sweet v. Commissioner of Human Services 702 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In re Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn., Johnson v. Comm’r of Health
In Re Detailing Criteria & Standards for Measuring an Electric Utility's Good Faith Efforts in Meeting the Renewable … 700 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re Detailing Criteria & Standards for Measuring an Electric Utility's Good Faith Efforts in Meeting the Renewable … 700 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
An agency decision is arbitrary and capricious if it reflects an exercise of the agency’s will rather than an exercise of its judgment, In re Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn., -83 (Minn.2001), or if the agency relies on factors that the legislature did not intend the agency to consider, fails to consider an important aspect of the issue, provides an explanation that is contrary to the record, or renders a decision so implausible that it could not be ascribed to agen
Anderson v. State, Department of Natural Resources 693 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 2005
Anderson v. State, Department of Natural Resources 693 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 2005
When reviewing agency decisions, courts “adhere to the fundamental concept that decisions of administrative agencies enjoy a presumption of correctness, and deference should be shown by courts to the agencies’ expertise and their special knowledge in the field of their technical training, education, and experience.” In re Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota, ().
In Re the Appeal of Rocheleau 686 N.W.2d 882 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Appeal of Rocheleau 686 N.W.2d 882 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Co. v. Quast Transfer, Inc., 288 Minn. 442 , (quotation omitted); see also In re Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn.
In Re Universal Underwriters Life Insurance Co. 685 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re Universal Underwriters Life Insurance Co. 685 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-78 (Minn.2001) (quotations, citations and footnote omitted).
Johnson v. Commissioner of Health 671 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Johnson v. Commissioner of Health 671 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In re Excess Surplus Stahis of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn.
Max Schwartzman & Sons v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 670 N.W.2d 746 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Max Schwartzman & Sons v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 670 N.W.2d 746 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
When reviewing agency decisions we “adhere to the fundamental concept that decisions of administrative agencies enjoy a presumption of correctness, and deference should be shown by courts to the agencies’ expertise and their special knowledge in the field of their technical training, education, and experience.” In re Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn., ().
Saif Food Market v. Commissioner, State, Department of Health 664 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Saif Food Market v. Commissioner, State, Department of Health 664 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Substantial evidence is “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” (citation omitted).
In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Permits in the City of … 664 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2003
In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Permits in the City of … 664 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2003
HealthPartners, Inc. v. Bernstein 655 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
HealthPartners, Inc. v. Bernstein 655 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
When reviewing agency decisions, we “adhere to the fundamental concept that decisions of administrative agencies enjoy a presumption of correctness, and deference should be shown by courts to the agencies’ expertise and their special knowledge in the field of their technical training, education, and experience.” In re Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn., ().
Mattice v. Minnesota Property Insurance Placement 655 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Mattice v. Minnesota Property Insurance Placement 655 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
We note that “judicial deference * * * is extended to an agency decision-maker in the interpretation of statutes that the agency is charged with administering and enforcing.” (citations and quotations omitted).
Rostamkhani v. City of St. Paul 645 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Rostamkhani v. City of St. Paul 645 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
§ 14.69 (2000) (enumerating criteria for judicial review of agency decisions); In re Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn., Hard Times Cafe, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis (applying principles of Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act to city councils).
J.R.B. v. Department of Human Services 633 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
J.R.B. v. Department of Human Services 633 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(“administrative agencies enjoy a presumption of correctness, and deference should be shown by courts to the agencies’ expertise and their special knowledge in the field of their technical training, education, and experience” (citation omitted)).