Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Powell v. Anderson, 660 N.W.2d 107.

59 citing documents.

Szarzynski v. Szarzynski 732 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
( was superseded by statute); (noting “statutes have superseded the common law in most aspects of family law.”).
State v. Dorsey 701 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 2005
State v. Dorsey 701 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 2005
State v. Byron 683 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Byron 683 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Although governing precedent precludes us from permitting plea withdrawal as a remedy here, we recognize that the Minnesota Supreme Court may elect to do so if the supreme court finds it necessary to ensure "the fair administration of justice.” (acknowledging its supervisory power to ensure the fair administration of justice); (declining to exercise supervisory powers reserved for the Minnesota Supreme Court), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc. 676 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 2004
Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc. 676 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 2004
§ 480A.08, subd 3(c) (2002)
Greer v. State 673 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 2004
Greer v. State 673 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 2004
We have noted that Canon 3D(1) is not purely aspirational in its terms, because it uses the operative verb “shall disqualify.” -15 (Minn.2003).