Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Occhino v. Grover, 640 N.W.2d 357.

71 citing documents.

Stacey Marable, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
A19-0507 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“[I]t is t he session laws and the revisor’ s 4 version of Minnesota Statutes that contain the official text of a statute.” review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
State v. Wood 922 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Wood 922 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
at 436 ; see also State v. Eason , , 842 (Minn. 2018) ; Nelson , d at 436 ; State v. Leathers , , 608-09 (Minn. 2011) ; Occhino v. Grover , , 359-60 (Minn. App. 2002), review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
Turk Trust, LLC, successor-in-interest to LAD, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Occhino v. Grover , review denied (Minn. May 29, 2002).
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Occhino v. Grover , review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
Determination of an Appropriate Unit & Certification as Exclusive Representative Service Employees International Union, Local 284 v. University … 902 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Determination of an Appropriate Unit & Certification as Exclusive Representative Service Employees International Union, Local 284 v. University … 902 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
State v. Prigge 900 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Prigge 900 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(noting that court may determine a statute’s meaning by examining its plain language, "drawing] from the full-act context of the statutory provision”), review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002), .
State v. Larson 895 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Larson 895 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn, May 29, 2002).
Joseph Roach, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See State v. Thompson , -60 (Minn. App. 2002), review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
Cynthia M. Leisey, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
James Linn v. BCBSM, Inc. 890 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
James Linn v. BCBSM, Inc. 890 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
Elisea Cervantes Anzures v. Michele Leann Ward, City of Saint Paul 890 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Elisea Cervantes Anzures v. Michele Leann Ward, City of Saint Paul 890 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
and draws from the full-act context of the statutory provision.” review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
Bruce Township v. Kevin Schmitz, Nathan A. Baum Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Bruce Township v. Kevin Schmitz, Nathan A. Baum Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Glen Paul Court Neighborhood Ass’n v. Paster, review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
Bio Wood Processing, LLC, Relator v. Rice County Board of Commissioners Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Bio Wood Processing, LLC, Relator v. Rice County Board of Commissioners Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-60 (Minn. App. 2002), review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
Persigehl v. Ridgebrook Investments Ltd. Partnership 858 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Persigehl v. Ridgebrook Investments Ltd. Partnership 858 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Plain meaning “presupposes the ordinary usage of words that are not technically used or statutorily defined, relies on accepted punctuation and syntax, and draws from the full-act context of the statutory provision.” (citations omitted), review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
Jeff Persigehl and Samone Bodley, individually and on behalf of the putative classes, (A14-0027), (A14-0123) v. Ridgebrook Investments … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jeff Persigehl and Samone Bodley, individually and on behalf of the putative classes, (A14-0027), (A14-0123) v. Ridgebrook Investments … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Plain meaning “presupposes the ordinary usage of words that are not technically used or statutorily defined, relies on accepted punctuation and syntax, and draws from the full-act context of the statutory provision.” (citations omitted), review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
Greg Peterson, Relator v. Richfield Civil Service Commission Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Greg Peterson, Relator v. Richfield Civil Service Commission Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“To determine the meaning of a statute, we look first and foremost to the language of the statute itself.” review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
BVA Equities, LLC, Relator v. City of New Hope Minn. Ct. App. 2014
BVA Equities, LLC, Relator v. City of New Hope Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“To determine the meaning of a statute, we look first and foremost to the language of the statute itself.” review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
In re the Guardianship of Tschumy 834 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Guardianship of Tschumy 834 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002)
Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth v. Lee 832 N.W.2d 868 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth v. Lee 832 N.W.2d 868 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“If the meaning of statutory language is not plain, courts resolve ambiguity by looking to legislative intent, agency interpretation, and principles of continuity which include consistency with laws on the same or similar subjects.” review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
Marriage of Jones v. Jarvinen 814 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Marriage of Jones v. Jarvinen 814 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
To address appellant’s argument, we examine the plain language of subdivision 7, “drawfing] from [its] full-act context.” review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002); see Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (setting forth plain-meaning rule).
Young v. Jesson 796 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Young v. Jesson 796 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
(stating that statutes must be construed in whole-act context), review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
Marriage of Wareham v. Wareham 791 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Marriage of Wareham v. Wareham 791 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
§ 645.08(1) (2008); review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
Edwards v. HOPKINS PLAZA LTD. PARTNERSHIP 783 N.W.2d 171 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Edwards v. HOPKINS PLAZA LTD. PARTNERSHIP 783 N.W.2d 171 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
§ 982.1 (b) (2009); review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
City of West St. Paul v. Krengel 748 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
City of West St. Paul v. Krengel 748 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
But if “a statute’s meaning is plain, judicial construction is neither necessary nor proper.” (citing American Tower, d at 312 ), review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
Ittel v. Pietig 705 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Ittel v. Pietig 705 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. Sherburne County 695 N.W.2d 630 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. Sherburne County 695 N.W.2d 630 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
review denied (Minn. May 28, 2002).
Block 25 Committee v. City of Walker 690 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2005