Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Nordby v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co., 329 N.W.2d 820.

67 citing documents.

Cargill, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance Co. 784 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 2010
Distinguished Cargill, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance Co. 784 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 2010
Paul School District No. 625 v. Columbia Transit Corp.
Cargill, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance Co. 766 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Wanzek Construction, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of Wausau 679 N.W.2d 322 Minn. 2004
Wanzek Construction, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of Wausau 679 N.W.2d 322 Minn. 2004
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh 643 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh 643 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Mickman Bros., Inc. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 639 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Mickman Bros., Inc. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 639 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Andrew L. Youngquist, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co. 625 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Andrew L. Youngquist, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co. 625 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Co., (indicating court looked at the payment of premiums in determining coverage).
Redeemer Covenant Church of Brooklyn Park v. Church Mutual Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Redeemer Covenant Church of Brooklyn Park v. Church Mutual Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Co., (“[a]n insurer has no right of action against another insurer to recover the cost of defending the insured, since there is no contractual obligation between insurers.”).
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 552 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 552 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Steele v. Great West Casualty Co. 540 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Steele v. Great West Casualty Co. 540 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Bemboom v. Dairyland Ins. Co. 529 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Bemboom v. Dairyland Ins. Co. 529 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Northern States Power Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 523 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1994
Northern States Power Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 523 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1994
Neuman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 492 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1992
Neuman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 492 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1992
Midway National Bank of St. Paul v. Bollmeier 474 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 1991
Midway National Bank of St. Paul v. Bollmeier 474 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 1991
Co., controlled the priority of Hartford’s policy as against State Farm Fire.
American National Fire Insurance Co. v. Estate of Fournelle 472 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1991
American National Fire Insurance Co. v. Estate of Fournelle 472 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1991
Midway National Bank of St. Paul v. Bollmeier 462 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Midway National Bank of St. Paul v. Bollmeier 462 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
clearly controls the outcome.
Sutherland v. Allstate Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 150 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Sutherland v. Allstate Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 150 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Balder v. Haley 441 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Balder v. Haley 441 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Republic Underwriters Insurance Co. 429 N.W.2d 695 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Republic Underwriters Insurance Co. 429 N.W.2d 695 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Morris v. Weiss 414 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Morris v. Weiss 414 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Amatuzio v. United States Fire Insurance Co. 409 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Amatuzio v. United States Fire Insurance Co. 409 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(one of the fundamentals of insurance law is that ambiguous language in an insurance policy is to be construed in favor of the insured); (a competing reasonable interpretation of the policy gives rise to an ambiguity and the insurer’s reading must give way to the insured’s); Canadian Universal Insurance Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc.
Sonneman v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 403 N.W.2d 701 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Sonneman v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 403 N.W.2d 701 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Rusthoven v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co. 387 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1986
Rusthoven v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co. 387 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1986
(“When language of an insurance policy is ambiguous or susceptible of two meanings, it must be given the meaning which is favorable to the finding of insurance coverage.”); Security Mutual Casualty Co. v. Luthi, 303 Minn. 161 , Hammer v. Malkerson Motors, Inc., 269 Minn. 563 , 1
Jostens, Inc. v. Mission Insurance Co. 387 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 1986
Jostens, Inc. v. Mission Insurance Co. 387 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 1986
cited by the court of appeals, is not in point.
North Star Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ziebarth 386 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1986
West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 384 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1986
West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 384 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1986
Nordby v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co.