Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Pikula v. Pikula, 374 N.W.2d 705.
- Marriage of Hoffa v. Hoffa 382 N.W.2d 522 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Marriage of Bateman v. Bateman
382 N.W.2d 240
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Appellate review is limited to “whether the trial court abused its discretion by making findings unsupported by the evidence or by improperly applying the law.”
- In re Guardianship of D.M.S. 379 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- In re Guardianship of D.M.S. 379 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Meier v. Connelly 378 N.W.2d 812 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Meier v. Connelly 378 N.W.2d 812 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Evens v. Evens 376 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Ozenna v. Parmelee 377 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Ozenna v. Parmelee 377 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Evens v. Evens 376 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Jones v. Jones 377 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Jones v. Jones 377 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Kennedy v. Kennedy 376 N.W.2d 702 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Marriage of Kennedy v. Kennedy
376 N.W.2d 702
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The supreme court recently held that consideration of these factors “require[s] that when both parents seek custody of a child too young to express a preference for a particular parent and one parent has been the primary caretaker, custody be awarded to the primary parent absent a showing that that parent is unfit to be the custodian.”
- Marriage of Sefkow v. Sefkow 374 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 1985
-
Marriage of Sefkow v. Sefkow
374 N.W.2d 733
Minn. 1985
ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Robert J. Sefkow for further review of the decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, granted for the limited purpose of remanding the matter to the Court of Appeals for its reconsideration of its decision in light of this court’s