Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Corbin, 343 N.W.2d 874.

43 citing documents.

State v. Gosewisch 921 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Tarah Louise Fichtner 867 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tarah Louise Fichtner 867 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that “we ‘cannot supply that which the legislature purposely omits or inadvertently overlooks’” (quoting Northland Country Club v. Comm’r of Taxation, 308 Minn. 265, 271, )).
State v. Woelfel 621 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Woelfel 621 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
However, “penal statutes must be construed strictly; any reasonable doubt must be interpreted in favor of the defendant.” -76 (Minn.App.1984) ( State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197, 200 , ).
State v. Tomlin 609 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Tomlin 609 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-76 (Minn.App.1984) (stating that “penal statutes must be construed strictly; any reasonable doubt must be interpreted in favor of the defendant”).
Foster on Behalf of J.B. v. Brooks 546 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Foster on Behalf of J.B. v. Brooks 546 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
St. Louis County Attorney's Office v. Twenty-Four Thousand Six Hundred Forty-Three & 01/100 Dollars ($24,643.01) in Various Denominations … 524 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
St. Louis County Attorney's Office v. Twenty-Four Thousand Six Hundred Forty-Three & 01/100 Dollars ($24,643.01) in Various Denominations … 524 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Larson Transfer & Storage, Inc., 310 Minn. 295, 304
State v. Hulst 510 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Hulst 510 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(quoting Northland Country Club v. Commissioner of Taxation, 308 Minn. 265, 271 , ).
State Ex Rel. McMaster v. Benson 495 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State Ex Rel. McMaster v. Benson 495 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(more particular statute prevails over general provision).
State v. Gamez 494 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Stevens 459 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Stevens 459 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State ex rel. Mendota Heights Police Department v. Coley 453 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State ex rel. Mendota Heights Police Department v. Coley 453 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Lewandowski 443 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Lewandowski 443 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197, 200 , State v. Moseng, 254 Minn. 263, 269 , People v. Rehkopf 422 Mich.
City of Faribault v. One 1976 Buick LeSabre, Serial No. 4P39J6X159337 408 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
City of Faribault v. One 1976 Buick LeSabre, Serial No. 4P39J6X159337 408 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State, Department of Public Safety v. Van Bus Delivery Co. 400 N.W.2d 759 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State, Department of Public Safety v. Van Bus Delivery Co. 400 N.W.2d 759 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
for the proposition that penal statutes must be strictly construed and any doubt must be interpreted in the defendant’s favor.
State v. Lewis 394 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Lewis 394 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
This court recently stated that “penal statutes must be construed strictly; any reasonable doubt must be interpreted in favor of the defendant.” -76 (Minn.Ct.App.1984) (citing State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197, 200 , ).
State v. Koon Meng Chan 393 N.W.2d 228 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Serstock 390 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Laue v. Production Credit Ass'n of Blooming Prairie 390 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Renstrom v. Independent School District No. 261 390 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Renstrom v. Independent School District No. 261 390 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
We cannot supply what the legislature “purposely omits or inadvertently overlooks.” Wallace v. Commissioner of Taxation, 289 Minn. 220, 230
State v. Johnson 391 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Johnson 391 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Aarsvold 376 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Layman 376 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Layman 376 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Aarsvold 376 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Ruud v. Ruud 372 N.W.2d 851 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Ruud v. Ruud 372 N.W.2d 851 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Andow 372 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Andow 372 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Penal statutes, particularly felony statutes, “must be construed strictly; any reasonable doubt must be interpreted in favor of the defendant.” see State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197