Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Kivimaki, 345 N.W.2d 759.

26 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Jeremiah Jerome Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Jeremiah Jerome Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(citing Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 (1938)).
Joshua Chiazor Ezeka, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. 2025
Joshua Chiazor Ezeka, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. 2025
And we previously have recognized that “the validity of a waiver of the right to counsel under either the Sixth or Fifth Amendment [of the United States Constitution] is judged by essentially the same standard.” ().
State v. Hohenwald 815 N.W.2d 823 Minn. 2012
State v. Hohenwald 815 N.W.2d 823 Minn. 2012
1 (“An offense punishable by life imprisonment must be prosecuted by indictment.”) (emphasis added); (recognizing that Rule 17.01 required an indictment to proceed on charges of first-degree murder).
State v. Clark 738 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2007
State v. Clark 738 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2007
1232 , 51 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977)); (adopting the Eighth Circuit’s conclusion that the validity of a waiver of the right to counsel under either the Sixth or Fifth Amendment “is judged by essentially the same standard”).
State v. Robinson 427 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 1988
State v. Robinson 427 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 1988
1336, 1342-43 , 10 L.Ed.2d 513 (1963)
State v. Erickson 403 N.W.2d 281 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Erickson 403 N.W.2d 281 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Smith 380 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Smith 380 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Campbell 367 N.W.2d 454 Minn. 1985
State v. Campbell 367 N.W.2d 454 Minn. 1985
1336, 1343 , 10 L.Ed.2d 513 (1963)
State v. Spurgin 358 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1984
State v. Spurgin 358 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1984
1880, 1884 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981)
State v. Mattson 357 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1984
State v. Mattson 357 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1984
State v. Heidelberger 353 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Heidelberger 353 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
the Court held that the admission into evidence of defendant’s confessions to police obtained after he had been charged with first-degree murder did not violate his Sixth Amendment rights.
State v. Nunn 351 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Nunn 351 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Although recently the Supreme Court, decided that an accused may waive his right to counsel if it is a “voluntary, knowing and intelligent” waiver, it is important that in Kivi-maki there was no indication that the accused had retained counsel at the time he was questioned.
State v. Cromey 348 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 1984
State v. Cromey 348 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 1984

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by