Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hosley v. Armstrong Cork Co., 383 N.W.2d 289.

41 citing documents.

Stephen Ballard v. City of Duluth, Professional Golf Management, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Stephen Ballard v. City of Duluth, Professional Golf Management, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Alice Ann Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud 853 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 2014
Alice Ann Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud 853 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 2014
ligation is uncol-lectible from that party” and to “reallocate any uncollectible amopht ataorig the other parties, including a claimant at fault, according to their respective percentages of fault.” The term “party” in subdivision 2 “means all persons who are parties to the tort, regardless of whether they are named in the lawsuit.” Staab I, d at 76
O'Brien v. Dombeck 823 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
O'Brien v. Dombeck 823 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(applying that definition).
Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud 813 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 2012
Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud 813 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 2012
Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud 780 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud 780 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Beginning with the word “person,” we observe that “person” must be defined broadly to include not just a party to a lawsuit, but any tortfeasor “whose fault has been submitted to the jury, or, in other words, parties to the transaction.” (defining “party” for purposes of the reallocation provisions of Minn.Stat.
Bunce v. A.P.I., Inc. 696 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Bunce v. A.P.I., Inc. 696 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(stating that Pierringer releases reserve “the plaintiffs right to maintain a cause of action against any nonsettling defendant, but releases from liability any defendant who is a party to the settlement agreement”).
Van Guilder v. National Freight, Inc. 686 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Van Guilder v. National Freight, Inc. 686 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In that circumstance, the district court “shall determine whether all or part of a party’s equitable share of the obligation is uncol-lectible from that party and shall reallocate any uncollectible amount among the other parties, including a claimant at fault, according to their respective percentages of fault.” Id.; -93 (Minn.1986); (holding that “a court must reallocate all uncollectible obligations among tortfeasors who can pay”).
Schendel v. Hennepin County Medical Center 484 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Schendel v. Hennepin County Medical Center 484 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Kohn v. La Manufacture Francaise Des Pneumatiques Michelin 476 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Kohn v. La Manufacture Francaise Des Pneumatiques Michelin 476 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Computer Tool & Engineering, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co. 453 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Computer Tool & Engineering, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co. 453 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Schneider v. Buckman 433 N.W.2d 98 Minn. 1988
Schneider v. Buckman 433 N.W.2d 98 Minn. 1988
On the other hand, Buckman asserts that the procedure for determining uncollectibility, (hereinafter Hosley I ) was not followed.
Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 426 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1988
Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 426 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1988
Rambaum v. Swisher 423 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Rambaum v. Swisher 423 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
294 n. 3 (reallocation formula).
Fette v. Peterson 404 N.W.2d 862 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Fette v. Peterson 404 N.W.2d 862 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Frederickson v. Alton M. Johnson Co. 402 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1987
Frederickson v. Alton M. Johnson Co. 402 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1987
that a Pierringer agreement “does not waive joint liability between all defendants.” Id.
Hosley v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. 401 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hosley v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. 401 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
aff 'd in part, rev’d in part
Ketterling v. Spud Bar, Inc. 398 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Ketterling v. Spud Bar, Inc. 398 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Frederickson v. Alton M. Johnson Co. 390 N.W.2d 786 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Frederickson v. Alton M. Johnson Co. 390 N.W.2d 786 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Normally, upon a finding of uncollectibility the trial court must reallocate the uncol-lectible share “among all individuals at fault, including a claimant.”
Steinbrecher v. McLeod Cooperative Power Ass'n 392 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Steinbrecher v. McLeod Cooperative Power Ass'n 392 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Ripka v. Mehus 390 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Ripka v. Mehus 390 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
at 902-03 (emphasis added); (reiterating the Lines rule).
Reedon of Faribault, Inc. v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. 387 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1986