Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Johnson v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 366 N.W.2d 347.

63 citing documents.

Edwards v. Commissioner of Public Safety 381 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Edwards v. Commissioner of Public Safety 381 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Harris, 295 Minn. 38, 42
Bohlig v. Commissioner of Public Safety 379 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bohlig v. Commissioner of Public Safety 379 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
“Probable cause exists where all the facts and circumstances would warrant a cautious person to believe that the suspect was driving or operating a vehicle while under the influence.”
Burke v. Commissioner of Public Safety 377 N.W.2d 78 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Burke v. Commissioner of Public Safety 377 N.W.2d 78 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Probable cause exists when the facts and circumstances “would warrant a cautious person to believe that the suspect was driving or operating a vehicle while under the influence.”
Roach v. Commissioner of Public Safety 380 N.W.2d 134 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Roach v. Commissioner of Public Safety 380 N.W.2d 134 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
“Probable cause exists where all the facts and circumstances would warrant a cautious person to believe that the suspect was driving or operating a vehicle while under the influence.”
Hasbrook v. Commissioner of Public Safety 374 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hasbrook v. Commissioner of Public Safety 374 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Such probable cause exists if “all the facts and circumstances would warrant a cautious person to believe that the suspect was driving or operating a vehicle while under the influence.”
Berge v. Commissioner of Public Safety 370 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Swapinski v. Commissioner of Public Safety 368 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Swapinski v. Commissioner of Public Safety 368 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 1985