Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Martenies, 350 N.W.2d 470.

41 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Christopher Michael Kapol. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
We have stated that “when evidence as to the existence of a psychopathic personality is in conflict, the question is one of fact to be determined by the [district] court upon all the evidence.” d 470, 472 (Minn. App. 1984), rev. denied (Minn. Sep.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Eugene Christopher Banks. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“[A] person may not assert his right to treatment until he is actually deprived of that treatment.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of the CIVIL COMMITMENT OF: Brent Charles NIELSEN 863 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the CIVIL COMMITMENT OF: Brent Charles NIELSEN 863 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 470, 472-73 (Minn. App. 1984) (describing a dual civil and criminal commitment).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Gordon Emil Miles. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Gordon Emil Miles. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
As both parties acknowledge, “a person may not assert his right to treatment until he is actually deprived of that treatment.” (rejecting claim in SPP appeal), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Civil Commitment of Crosby 824 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Civil Commitment of Crosby 824 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
review denied (Minn. Sep.
In Re the Civil Commitment of Travis 767 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Civil Commitment of Travis 767 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
order”), review denied (Minn. May 31, 1985); -84 (Minn.App.1984) (noting that Pope’s claim about receiving “inadequate treatment is speculative and premature” because no deprivation of treatment had occurred); (noting that right-to-treatment issue can only be raised after deprivation of treatment); (noting that without deprivation of treatment, issue was premature because appellant had not yet been sent to commitment facility), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In Re Robb 622 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Robb 622 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(citation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Matter of Pirkl 531 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Matter of Pirkl 531 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In Re Irwin 529 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In Re Irwin 529 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(commitment as a psychopathic personality), pet.
Matter of Kunshier 521 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Matter of Kunshier 521 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(citing Dittrich v. Brown County, 215 Minn. 234 , ), pet.
In Re Blodgett 510 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1994
Matter of Linehan 503 N.W.2d 142 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Matter of Buckhalton 503 N.W.2d 148 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Matter of Buckhalton 503 N.W.2d 148 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Matter of Linehan 503 N.W.2d 142 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Rogers v. Ponti-Peterson Post 1720 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States of America, Inc. 495 N.W.2d 897 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Rogers v. Ponti-Peterson Post 1720 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States of America, Inc. 495 N.W.2d 897 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Koelln v. Nexus Residential Treatment Facility 494 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Koelln v. Nexus Residential Treatment Facility 494 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
473 *921 (Minn.App.1984), pet.
Matter of Clemons 494 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Matter of Clemons 494 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Re Blodgett 490 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re Blodgett 490 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re Stilinovich 479 N.W.2d 731 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re Stilinovich 479 N.W.2d 731 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Matter of Monson 478 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Matter of Monson 478 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Matter of Clements 440 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Matter of Clements 440 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Moore 431 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Moore 431 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Re Brown 414 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re Brown 414 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
As this court stated in : “When evidence as to the existence of a psychopathic personality is in conflict, the question is one of fact to be determined by the trial court upon all the evidence.” Id.