Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Tyler v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 368 N.W.2d 275.

55 citing documents.

Thomas Patrick Ness, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Safety , - 81 (Minn. 1985).
Brian Matthew Nash, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Thus, the Jensen court relied on t he supreme court’s
John Noel McCormick, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Safety, -81 (Minn. 1985).
Jensen v. Comm'r Safety 932 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Jensen v. Comm'r Safety 932 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Rosenbush 931 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 2019
State v. Rosenbush 931 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 2019
Safety , , 280 (Minn. 1985) ("Compliance with the procedures of the implied consent law is a prerequisite to revocation pursuant to the implied consent law.").
Brian Allen Platt, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Saf ety, (holding that a driver’s license could not be revoked pursuant to the implied -consent law because police did not read the implied -consent advisory to the driver ).
State v. Wood 922 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Wood 922 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Safety , , 281 (Minn. 1985), and State v. Scott , , 377 (Minn. App. 1991) ).
State v. Mike 919 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Mike 919 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Hunn 911 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 2018
State v. Hunn 911 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 2018
Safety , , 281 (Minn. 1985) ("Here there was no intent to comply, attempt to comply or compliance with the implied consent law.
State v. Hunn 899 N.W.2d 541 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Hunn 899 N.W.2d 541 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Safety, (“Compliance with the procedures of the implied consent law is a prerequisite to revocation pursuant to the implied consent law.”).
Jason Richard Montonye v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jason Richard Montonye v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Safety, 7 see also Scott, d at 377 (noting that “the purpose of the implied consent advisory is to inform the driver of the serious consequences of his or her refusal”).
State of Minnesota v. Carmilla J. Thibodeau-Schoeszler Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Carmilla J. Thibodeau-Schoeszler Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Safety, (suppressing blood-test results taken without implied-consent advisory in a license revocation proceeding but approving use of results in criminal prosecution); review denied (Minn. Jun.
State v. Shriner 751 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 2008
State v. Shriner 739 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Lee 585 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1998
State v. Lee 585 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1998
State v. Nordin 571 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Nordin 571 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
For this proposition, (test results may be used in DWI prosecution without compliance with implied consent statute if results are legally obtained), (legally obtained test results may be used in DWI prosecution regardless of compliance with implied consent law), and St
Heuton v. Commissioner of Public Safety 541 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Heuton v. Commissioner of Public Safety 541 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Safety, State, Dept. of Pub.
Umphlett v. Commissioner of Public Safety 533 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Umphlett v. Commissioner of Public Safety 533 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Nielsen 530 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Nielsen 530 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Schauer 501 N.W.2d 673 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Schauer 501 N.W.2d 673 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Safety, : As a matter of federal constitutional law, the warrantless removal of blood for a blood alcohol test is clearly permitted if police have probable cause to believe that the defendant has committed the offense of DWI and that the removal of blood is necessary to preserve evidence of the defendant’s gui
State v. Aschnewitz 483 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Aschnewitz 483 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Scott 473 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Scott 473 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Dittel 464 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Dittel 464 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
1 *603 This question was partially answered in Tyler v. Comm’r of Public Safety, where the supreme court said: It is true that * * * [the police officer] could not point to any objective evidence such as skid marks or any information from eyewitnesses to suggest that Tyler caused the accident.
McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 460 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Franko v. Commissioner of Public Safety 432 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Franko v. Commissioner of Public Safety 432 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
“Compliance with the procedures of the implied consent law is a prerequisite to revocation pursuant to the implied consent law.”
Young v. Commissioner of Public Safety 420 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1988
Young v. Commissioner of Public Safety 420 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1988
“Compliance with the procedures of the implied consent law is a prerequisite to revocation pursuant to the implied consent law.”
Villeneuve v. Commissioner of Public Safety 417 N.W.2d 304 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Villeneuve v. Commissioner of Public Safety 417 N.W.2d 304 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
the supreme court stated: It would be improper and unfair to revoke a driver’s license for refusing to take a test if an advisory were not given.
State v. Halverson 413 N.W.2d 859 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Halverson 413 N.W.2d 859 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Golinvaux v. Commissioner of Public Safety 403 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 1987