Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Campion v. Campion, 385 N.W.2d 1.

36 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Zondra A. Thompson, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(affirming the district court’s adoption of one party’s expert valuation when the expert’s qualifications were not challenged).
Marriage of Gottsacker v. Gottsacker 664 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 2003
Marriage of Gottsacker v. Gottsacker 664 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 2003
See, -5 (Minn.App.1986) (characterizing rental income available from nonmarital apartment building as marital income); (characterizing rental income received annually from nonmarital farm land as marital property).
Marriage of Chamberlain v. Chamberlain 615 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Marriage of Chamberlain v. Chamberlain 615 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Marriage of Olsen v. Olsen 552 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of White v. White 521 N.W.2d 874 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Marriage of White v. White 521 N.W.2d 874 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Id.; -5 (Minn.App.1986) (characterizing rental income available from nonmarital apartment building as marital income); pet.
In re the Marriage of Freeing v. Freeing 479 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Freking v. Freking 479 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Freking v. Freking 479 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
1985); see Campion v. Campion , , 4 (Minn.App.
In re the Marriage of Freeing v. Freeing 479 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Marriage of Pettit v. Pettit 472 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Pettit v. Pettit 472 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Swick v. Swick 467 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Swick v. Swick 467 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Burns v. Burns 466 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Burns v. Burns 466 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Burwell v. Burwell 438 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Dick v. Dick 438 N.W.2d 435 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Burwell v. Burwell 438 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Dick v. Dick 438 N.W.2d 435 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(citing Hertz v. Hertz, 304 Minn. 144, 145 , ); (“[I]n Minnesota the owner of property is presumptively knowledgable about its value.”) DECISION We affirm the trial court’s valuation of the homestead, but reverse
Marriage of Nelson v. Nelson 411 N.W.2d 868 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Nelson v. Nelson 411 N.W.2d 868 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Roel v. Roel 406 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Roel v. Roel 406 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Hafner v. Hafner 406 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Hafner v. Hafner 406 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Bates v. Bates 404 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Bates v. Bates 404 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Thedens v. Thedens 400 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Thedens v. Thedens 400 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Moore v. Moore 391 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Moore v. Moore 391 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(rental income from apartment building); pet.
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 388 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 388 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1986

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by