Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Klink v. Ramsey County Ex Rel. Zacharias, 397 N.W.2d 894.
- Assata Kenneh, Minn. 2020
- Munro Holding, LLC v. Cook 695 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-
Munro Holding, LLC v. Cook
695 N.W.2d 379
Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Motors Corp., 300 F.3d 928, 935 (8th Cir.2002) (finding no sexual harassment when male co-worker made a pass at female coworker who had to work with him for three more years, suffering additional boorish behavior until she resigned); -02 (Minn.App.1986) (holding that foul language and vulgar behavior in workplace did not establish sexual harassment), review denied (Minn. Feb.
- Goins v. West Group 619 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
Goins v. West Group
619 N.W.2d 424
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
review denied (Minn. Feb.
- Costilla v. State 571 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-
Costilla v. State
571 N.W.2d 587
Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(-20 (Minn.1986); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 93 S.Ct.
- Cummings v. Koehnen 568 N.W.2d 418 Minn. 1997
-
Cummings v. Koehnen
568 N.W.2d 418
Minn. 1997
41; see, (foul language and vulgar behavior in workplace did not rise to level of actionable sexual harassment under MHRA).
- Cummings v. Koehnen 556 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-
Cummings v. Koehnen
556 N.W.2d 586
Minn. Ct. App. 1997
:- *590 Foul language and vulgar behavior in the workplace does not automatically trigger an actionable claim of sex discrimination by a worker who finds such language and conduct offensive or repulsive.
- Fore v. Health Dimensions, Inc. 509 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Fore v. Health Dimensions, Inc. 509 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Bougie v. Sibley Manor, Inc. 504 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Bougie v. Sibley Manor, Inc. 504 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Kay v. Peter Motor Co., Inc. 483 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Kay v. Peter Motor Co., Inc. 483 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Biegner v. Bloomington Chrysler/Plymouth, Inc. 426 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Biegner v. Bloomington Chrysler/Plymouth, Inc. 426 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Johnson v. Ramsey County 424 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Johnson v. Ramsey County 424 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Bersie v. Zycad Corp. 417 N.W.2d 288 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Bersie v. Zycad Corp.
417 N.W.2d 288
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
2 After reviewing the entire record, we cannot conclude the conduct of Bersie’s co-employees “substantially” interfered with Bersie’s employment or that the incidents were not “sufficiently severe or pervasive so as ‘to alter the conditions of [the victim’s] employment and create an abusive working condition.’ ” yet.
- Mpls. Police Dept. v. Mpls. Civ. Rights Com'n 402 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Mpls. Police Dept. v. Mpls. Civ. Rights Com'n 402 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 402 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 402 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Bersie v. Zycad Corp. 399 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Bersie v. Zycad Corp. 399 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 1987