Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Rainer, 411 N.W.2d 490.
-
State v. Thao
649 N.W.2d 414
Minn. 2002
Johnson, d at 435 ; Merrill, d at 111 .
- State v. Mix 646 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. Mix 646 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. Caldwell 639 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. Caldwell 639 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. Jackson 615 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Jackson 615 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Jackson 596 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
State v. Jackson
596 N.W.2d 262
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
See generally, (holding that jury experiment that did not go beyond evidence received was not improper).
- State v. Greenleaf 591 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1999
- State v. Greenleaf 591 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1999
- State v. Johnson 568 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1997
- State v. Johnson 568 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1997
- Rainer v. State 566 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1997
- Rainer v. State 566 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1997
- State v. Sebasky 547 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
-
State v. Sebasky
547 N.W.2d 93
Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(stating Spreigl evidence was proven by clear and convincing evidence because the defendant’s identity was not in doubt and the victim testified about the incident); (finding Spreigl incidents were proven by clear and convincing evidence because there was eyewitness testimony, no rebuttal, and the identity of the participants was not in doubt).
- State v. Netland 535 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1995
- State v. Netland 535 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1995
- State v. Bowles 530 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1995
- State v. Bowles 530 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1995
- State v. Miller 525 N.W.2d 576 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
State v. Miller
525 N.W.2d 576
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(ruling on a request for continuance is within trial court’s discretion).
- State v. Steinbuch 514 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1994
- State v. Steinbuch 514 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1994
- State v. Rainer 502 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 1993
- State v. Rainer 502 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 1993
- State v. Wiskow 501 N.W.2d 657 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Wiskow 501 N.W.2d 657 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Wermerskirchen 497 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1993
-
State v. Wermerskirchen
497 N.W.2d 235
Minn. 1993
where we upheld the admission of evidence of 16 to 19-year-old incidents which showed a repeating pattern of very similar conduct.
- State v. Barber 494 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Barber 494 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Friend 493 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1992
-
State v. Friend
493 N.W.2d 540
Minn. 1992
Given that requests for continuances are governed by the abuse of discretion standard, we hold that the trial court did not abuse its considerable discretion in denying the request for a continuance.
- Campbell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 489 N.W.2d 269 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State v. Maurer 488 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
Campbell v. Commissioner of Public Safety
489 N.W.2d 269
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-95 (Minn.1987) (presence of state’s expert during defense expert’s tests did not violate Sixth Amendment).
- State v. Maurer 488 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State v. Berry 484 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1992
- State v. Berry 484 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1992
- State v. Landin 472 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1991
-
State v. Landin
472 N.W.2d 854
Minn. 1991
While defendant attacks Bergstrom’s credibility, the weight and credibility given to the testimony of a witness is within the province of the jury, therefore the jury was free to believe Bergstrom’s testimony.
- State v. DeWald 464 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 1991
- State v. DeWald 464 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 1991
- State v. Cichon 458 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Cichon 458 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Bliss 457 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1990
-
State v. Bliss
457 N.W.2d 385
Minn. 1990
The weight and credibility of individual witnesses is for the jury to determine, and on review “it is necessary to assume that the jury believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any contrary evidence.” Ulvinen, d at 428 .
- State v. Gray 456 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1990