Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Complaint Concerning Miera, 426 N.W.2d 850.

28 citing documents.

Inquiry into the Conduct of the Honorable John P. Dehen Minn. 2025
Inquiry into the Conduct of the Honorable John P. Dehen Minn. 2025
Clear and convincing evidence requires that “the truth of the facts asserted is highly probable.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Inquiry into the Conduct of the Honorable Perez 843 N.W.2d 562 Minn. 2014
Inquiry into the Conduct of the Honorable Perez 843 N.W.2d 562 Minn. 2014
Under Rule 14(e), RBJS, we may direct “such discipline or other action as [we find] just and proper.” When we determine appropriate sanctions, we are “guided by the principle that the purpose of judicial discipline is not to punish, but ‘to protect the public by [ensuring] the integrity of the judicial system.’” ().
In re Disciplinary Action Against Kalla 811 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 2012
In re Disciplinary Action Against Kalla 811 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 2012
This standard is met where the “truth of the facts asserted is highly probable.” (internal quotation marks omitted).
Inquiry into the Conduct of Karasov 805 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 2011
Inquiry into the Conduct of Karasov 805 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 2011
Clear and convincing evidence requires that “the truth of the facts asserted is ‘highly probable.’ ” ().
Inquiry into the Conduct of Galler 805 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 2011
Inquiry into the Conduct of Galler 805 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 2011
“Clear and convincing evidence requires that the truth of the facts asserted be ‘highly probable.’ ” ()
In re Disciplinary Action Against Letourneau 792 N.W.2d 444 Minn. 2011
In re Disciplinary Action Against Letourneau 792 N.W.2d 444 Minn. 2011
The clear- and-convincing standard is met when “the truth of the facts asserted is ‘highly probable.’ ” ().
Inquiry Into the Conduct of the Blakely 772 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 2009
Inquiry Into the Conduct of the Blakely 772 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 2009
Rule 10(c)(2), Rules of Board on Judicial Standards
In Re Murphy 737 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2007
Inquiry Into the Conduct of the Honorable Stacey 737 N.W.2d 345 Minn. 2007
In Re Murphy 737 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2007
Inquiry Into the Conduct of the Honorable Stacey 737 N.W.2d 345 Minn. 2007
In Re Conduct of Ginsberg 690 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2004
In Re Conduct of Ginsberg 690 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2004
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Brehmer 620 N.W.2d 554 Minn. 2001
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Brehmer 620 N.W.2d 554 Minn. 2001
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Ray 610 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2000
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Ray 610 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2000
In re Witherow, 226 Minn. 58, 60
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Moeller 582 N.W.2d 554 Minn. 1998
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Moeller 582 N.W.2d 554 Minn. 1998
In Re the Application for the Discipline of Peters 428 N.W.2d 375 Minn. 1988
In Re the Application for the Discipline of Peters 428 N.W.2d 375 Minn. 1988
We have on previous occasions sanctioned sexual harassment perpetrated by judges, as have courts of other jurisdictions.