DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Krejci, 458 N.W.2d 407.

67 citing documents.

  • State v. Wolf 592 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
    The supreme court has recognized that “the legislature must have some room to expand upon the constitutional provisions relating to venue.” -11 (Minn.1990) (noting that if a state has jurisdiction over the crime, than determination of the precise county for trial is less significant).
  • State v. Worthy 583 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Worthy 583 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Camacho 561 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Camacho 561 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Brodie 529 N.W.2d 395 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • State v. Brodie 529 N.W.2d 395 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • State v. Nelson 523 N.W.2d 667 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Nelson 523 N.W.2d 667 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Larson 520 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Larson 520 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
    144 n. 1 (Minn.1982) (in “doubtful cases” in which the child victim has no idea in which county abuse occurred, the prosecutor may rely on section 627.15, in accord with Minn.R.Crim.P.
  • County of Benton v. County of Stearns 503 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • County of Benton v. County of Stearns 503 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Savior 480 N.W.2d 693 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Savior 480 N.W.2d 693 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Sanderson 469 N.W.2d 476 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Sanderson 469 N.W.2d 476 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    issued its most recent decision involving special venue provisions and upheld a special venue statute that allowed prosecution for child abuse in the county where the abuse occurred or in which the child is found.