Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite National City Bank of Minneapolis v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co., 447 N.W.2d 171.

45 citing documents.

Mark Lukens, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Co., (“[N]o legal principle permits violation of a contract condition to be completely ignored.”).
Andrew LaPalme, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Paul Fire & Marine Ins., d 171, 176 (Minn. 1989) ; see also Minn. Law.
EDF-RE US Development, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Co., (stating that “no legal principle permits violation of a contract condition to be completely ignored[;] [a] precedent condition must be performed or happen before a duty of immediate performance arises” (quotation and emphasis omitted)).
The Gables at the Reserve Homeowners Association, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Co., d 171, 176 (Minn. 1989) (defining a condition precedent as “any fact or event, subsequent to 4 the making of a contract, which must exist or occur before a duty of immediate performance arises under the contract”).
A19-1654 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Co., (defining a condition precedent as “any fact or event, subsequent to the making of a contract, which must exist or occur before a duty of immediate performance arises under the contract”); Carl Bolander & Sons, (“any fact except mer
In re the Matter of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee for Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., Mortgage … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co. , (defining a condition precedent as “any fact or event, subsequent to the making of a contract, which must exist or occur before a duty of immediate performance arises under the contract”).
Timothy Langdon, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Co., ( defining a condition precedent as “ a n y f a c t o r e v e n t , subsequent to the making of a contract, which must exist or occ ur before a duty of immediate performance arises under the contract”).
Capistrant v. Lifetouch Nat'l Sch. Studios, Inc. 916 N.W.2d 23 Minn. 2018
Capistrant v. Lifetouch Nat'l Sch. Studios, Inc. 916 N.W.2d 23 Minn. 2018
Co. , , 178 (Minn. 1989) ("[N]o legal principle permits violation of a contract condition to be completely ignored.").
Sherwood Forest, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Co. , 6 (Minn. 1989) (stating that a condition precedent is a fact or event after a contract is formed, that “must exist or occur before a duty of immediate performance arises under the contract”).
Capistrant v. Lifetouch National School Studios, Inc. 899 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Capistrant v. Lifetouch National School Studios, Inc. 899 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Richard J. Hartfiel v. Raymond Wilburn Allison, T. J. Potter Trucking, Inc., Westfield Insurance Company, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Richard J. Hartfiel v. Raymond Wilburn Allison, T. J. Potter Trucking, Inc., Westfield Insurance Company, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Randy Lundgren v. Diane Cash Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Randy Lundgren v. Diane Cash Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Timothy E. Lewis v. Paul J. Borchert Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Timothy E. Lewis v. Paul J. Borchert Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Co., (defining a condition precedent as “any fact or event, subsequent to the making of a contract, which must exist or occur before a duty of immediate performance arises under the contract”).
Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc. 741 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 2007
Hickman v. SAFECO Insurance Co. of America 695 N.W.2d 365 Minn. 2005
Hickman v. SAFECO Insurance Co. of America 695 N.W.2d 365 Minn. 2005
Vaubel Farms, Inc. v. Shelby Farmers Mutual 679 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Vaubel Farms, Inc. v. Shelby Farmers Mutual 679 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Wanzek Construction, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of Wausau 667 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Wanzek Construction, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of Wausau 667 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Smith v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 656 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Smith v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 656 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Franck 644 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Franck 644 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge 611 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 2000
Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge 611 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 2000
Rohrer v. Rick 529 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Rohrer v. Rick 529 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Krogness v. Best Buy Co., Inc. 524 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Krogness v. Best Buy Co., Inc. 524 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Bib Audio-Video Products v. Herold Marketing Associates, Inc. 517 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Bib Audio-Video Products v. Herold Marketing Associates, Inc. 517 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Houg v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 509 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Houg v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 509 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Matter of Trust Created by Hill 499 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Matter of Trust Created by Hill 499 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Co., cited in Meister v. Western Nat’l Mut.
Meister v. Western National Mutual Insurance 479 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1992
Meister v. Western National Mutual Insurance 479 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1992
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. General Mills, Inc. 470 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1991
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. General Mills, Inc. 470 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1991