Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Occupational License of Haymes, 444 N.W.2d 257.

35 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Application of Michael Schuster and Lonny Witkofsky for a Conditional Use Permit Minn. Ct. App. 2026
It is “well- settled law” that, under Minnesota Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure 120 and Minnesota Statutes section 606.01 (2024), “an aggrieved party has the common law right to petition for a writ of certiorari” when “no right of discretionary review has been provided by statute or appellate rules for the quasi-judicial decision of an administrative agency.” see also Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles Cnty.
A25-1125 In re Cottonwood County’s Decision on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Sioux … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A25-1125 In re Cottonwood County’s Decision on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Sioux … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Such a certiorari appeal may be taken by “an aggrieved party.” see also CCZO § 6, subd.
In re Calm Waters Cannabis Co., et al., Cristina Aranguiz, et al., Green Leaf MN, et al., Hendo … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
12 Zweber, d at 608-09; Minn. Stat. §§ 480A.06, subd.
Broadway Child Care Center, Inc., et al v. Minnesota Department of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-59 (Minn. 1989) (interpreting Minn. Stat. § 3.764, subd.
Jun Xiao v. Dr. Raquel Rodriguez, individually and in her official capacity, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See in re Occupational License of Haymes , d 257, 259 (Minn. 1989) (reversing review on the merits of quasi -judicial decision because of failure to timely petition for writ of certiorari).
Cosmos E. Eneh v. Minnesota Department of Health Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Elisea Cervantes Anzures v. Michele Leann Ward, City of Saint Paul 890 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Elisea Cervantes Anzures v. Michele Leann Ward, City of Saint Paul 890 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(reversing review on merits of quasi-judicial decision because of failure to timely petition for writ of certiorari).
Chad Nelson, Below v. Troy Schlener, Carla Brown, Below, Minnesota Department of Human Services 859 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 2015
Chad Nelson, Below v. Troy Schlener, Carla Brown, Below, Minnesota Department of Human Services 859 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 2015
of Sherburne, (holding that an aggrieved party has the right to petition for a writ of certiorari “[w]here no right of discretionary review has been provided by statute or appellate rules”).
County of Washington v. City of Oak Park Heights 818 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 2012
Williams v. Smith 820 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 2012
Williams v. Smith 820 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 2012
2 See Dead Lake Ass’n v. Otter Tail Cnty., (explaining that this court has “developed a body of case law treating the writ of certiorari as an extraordinary remedy that allows appellate review” of quasi-judicial decisions); (“Where no right of discretionary review has been provided by statute or appellate rules for the quasi-judicial decision of an administrative agency,” an aggrieved party can petition for a writ of certiorari).
County of Washington v. City of Oak Park Heights 818 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 2012
Minn. Const. art. 3, § 1; (explaining that judicial review of statewide executive agencies is limited by the separation of powers).
State Department of Labor & Industry Ex Rel. Special Compensation Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc. 555 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State Department of Labor & Industry Ex Rel. Special Compensation Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc. 555 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re Termination of Gay 555 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re Termination of Gay 555 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
16, 1994); Ultraflex, d at 90-91 (if writ is not timely issued or served, writ must be discharged for lack of jurisdiction); (discretionary appellate review barred by relator’s failure to perfect certiorari appeal in timely fashion).
Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency 551 N.W.2d 235 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency 551 N.W.2d 235 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 550 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1996
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 550 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1996
Because the denial of compensation from the harmful substance compensation account is not a quasi-judicial decision, we see no reason to mention much less to engage in an attack on dictum contained there.
In Re the Application of Merritt 537 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In Re the Application of Merritt 537 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Neitzel v. County of Redwood 521 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Neitzel v. County of Redwood 521 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 520 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 520 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Township of Honner v. Redwood County 518 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Township of Honner v. Redwood County 518 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Donovan Contracting of St. Cloud, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 469 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Donovan Contracting of St. Cloud, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 469 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Smith v. Powers 461 N.W.2d 53 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Smith v. Powers 461 N.W.2d 53 Minn. Ct. App. 1990