Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Carpenter, 459 N.W.2d 121.

38 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See, d 121, 125 (Minn. 1990) (“[W]hen a [district] court rules that evidence of a sexual assault victim’s prior sexual conduct is inadmissible, no reference to such conduct shall be made 7 in the presence of the jury.” (quotation omitted)); (concluding victim’s prior sex
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Martell Antonio Bloxson, Appellant. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 833, 839 (Minn. 1984); review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Dionte Gosa Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Dionte Gosa Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(discussing the concern of “besmirching” the character of a rape victim).
State of Minnesota v. Reynaldo Benitez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Reynaldo Benitez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Abuse of positions of trust and authority are aggravating factors justifying a durational departure.”
Ronald James Kettle v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ronald James Kettle v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“Abuse of trust relationship between victim and perpetrator may be an aggravating factor.”), review denied (Minn. May 18, 1988).
State v. Rourke 681 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Rourke 681 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
See, (church youth-group sponsor convicted of statutory rape); (live-in boyfriend victimized and -murdered his girlfriend’s young daughter), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State v. Valentine 630 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Valentine 630 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
hat typically involved in the commission of the crime in question” (emphasis added) (citation omitted)); (stating decision to depart is based on “whether the defendant’s conduct was significantly more or less serious than that typically involved in the commission of the crime in question” (emphasis added) (quotation omitted)); -8 (Minn.1990) (stating district court’s decision to depart must be based on its determination of “whether the defendant’s conduct was significantly more or less serious t
Rairdon v. State 557 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1996
Rairdon v. State 557 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1996
(holding that abuse of trust and authority can be valid bases for departure).
Minnegasco v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 549 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1996
Minnegasco v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 549 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1996
State v. Sebasky 547 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Sebasky 547 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Co., (refusing to consider legislative history when the legislature’s intent is clearly manifested by unambiguous language); (giving effect to the plain meaning of a statute when its language is clear and unambiguous); W.H.
Blackowiak v. Kemp 546 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1996
Green Giant Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue 534 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 1995
Green Giant Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue 534 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 1995
State v. Lunsford 507 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Lunsford 507 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-43 (Minn.1991) (only a rare case justifies greater-than-double departure); (abuse of position of trust helped support dispositional and less-than-double durational departure); (multiple penetrations alone will generally not justify greater-than-double departure), pet.
State v. Christopherson 500 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Christopherson 500 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue 497 N.W.2d 250 Minn. 1993
John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue 497 N.W.2d 250 Minn. 1993
State v. Lee 494 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1993
State v. Friend 493 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1992
State v. Friend 493 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1992
State v. Poole 489 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Poole 489 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
See, generally, Minn.Sent.Guidelines II.D.2.b.(1); (abuse of position of trust as church youth worker).
State v. Pearson 479 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Pearson 479 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(abuse of position of authority); (victim vulnerability); (abuse of position of authority and victim’s vulnerability), pet.
State v. Kobow 466 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Kobow 466 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Indeed, the supreme court did not question the applicability of the rape shield law to a fourteen-year-old victim; a victim clearly too young to consent.