Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Miller, 488 N.W.2d 235.

32 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In addition, appellate courts look to “the circumstances surrounding the requested continuance and whether the denial was so prejudicial in the preparation of an adequate defense as to ‘materially affect the outcome of the trial.’” (quoting State v. Lloyd , ); see also State v. King , (observing that appel late courts evaluate whether denial would prejudice the defendant ).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
By comparing Ramirez’s sentences with sentences in caselaw cited by the parties, this court applies “our collective, collegial experience in reviewing a large number of criminal appeals.” Rhoades, d at 140 (citing State v. Miller , ).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Mackey Keyota Drake Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Mackey Keyota Drake Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Daniel Morris Johnson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Daniel Morris Johnson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Williams v. State 764 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 2009
Williams v. State 764 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 2009
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Northeast Concrete Products, LLC 756 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Northeast Concrete Products, LLC 756 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
“The decision to grant a continuance is vested in the sound discretion of the trial court.” ().
State v. Rhoades 690 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Rhoades 690 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Richardson 670 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 2003
State v. Richardson 670 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 2003
The court relied on the “zone of privacy,” -18 (Minn.1983), and the fact that children were present, as departure factors.
State v. Olson 609 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Olson 609 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
This, coupled with the fact that there is no evidence that Olson had previously engaged in delaying tactics, does not support the district court’s belief that Olson was interested in “avoiding trial.” -40 (Minn.1992) (holding defendant not entitled to continuance when he refused to cooperate and contributed to delay); Fagerstrom, 286 Minn. at 299-300 , d at 264 (affirming denial of continuance where defendant, without explanation, sought new counsel on day of trial).
State v. Sanders 598 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 1999
State v. Sanders 598 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 1999
“The decision to grant a continuance is vested in the sound discretion of the trial court.” ().
State v. Warren 592 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1999
State v. Warren 592 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1999
State v. Willis 559 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1997
State v. Willis 559 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1997
Consecutive life sentences for first-degree murder are permissible so long as they “are commensurate with culpability and not an exaggeration of defendant’s criminality.” ().
State v. Roan 532 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1995
State v. Roan 532 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1995
Miller v. State 531 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1995
Miller v. State 531 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1995
State v. Ouk 516 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1994
State v. Ouk 516 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1994
State v. Bates 507 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Bates 507 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1993