Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Fabio v. Bellomo, 504 N.W.2d 758.

1039 citing documents.

Mario Ferbo Mancini v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The court will strike documents included in a party’s brief that are not part of the appellate record.” aff’d
Corval Constructors, Inc. v. FPD Power Development, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Corval Constructors, Inc. v. FPD Power Development, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
I. “A motion for summary judgment shall be granted when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that either party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
Johnny L. Moore v. Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Johnny L. Moore v. Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But leave should not be given if doing 5 so “would result in prejudice to the other party.”
Sean Kennedy v. Soo Line Railroad Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sean Kennedy v. Soo Line Railroad Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But because the supreme court has granted a petition for further review in Kinworthy, it is “of minimal precedential value to our analysis here.” n.1 (Minn. App. 1992), aff’d
Timothy E. Lewis v. Paul J. Borchert Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Timothy E. Lewis v. Paul J. Borchert Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Loren J. Zutz v. John Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Kimberly Shierts, Trustee for the Heirs of Jodie Shierts v. University of Minnesota Physicians, Regents of the University … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Kimberly Shierts, Trustee for the Heirs of Jodie Shierts v. University of Minnesota Physicians, Regents of the University … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
We must “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was granted.”
Loren J. Zutz v. John Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
DECISION “A motion for summary judgment shall be granted when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that either party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
William J. Cavanagh v. Allen R. Arvig, Chris Mensing, individually and d/b/a Lakes Country Landscaping & Irrigation, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
William J. Cavanagh v. Allen R. Arvig, Chris Mensing, individually and d/b/a Lakes Country Landscaping & Irrigation, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The district court has broad discretion “to grant or deny an amendment, and its action will not be reversed absent a clear abuse of 15 discretion.”
Gary Carlson v. Ray Barta Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Gary Carlson v. Ray Barta Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“A motion for summary judgment shall be granted when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that either party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
Gregory Monson v. Jeff Suck 855 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Gregory Monson v. Jeff Suck 855 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
P. 15.01, and leave to amend “should be freely granted, except where to do so would result in prejudice to the other party,”
Kimberlee Ann Nelson v. Lynette Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Kimberlee Ann Nelson v. Lynette Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
DECISION “A motion for summary judgment shall be granted when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that either party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” (citation omitted).
Ken B. Peterson, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry v. United Parcel Service, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Lakeview Methodist Health Care Center v. Kaci Paradis Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Lakeview Methodist Health Care Center v. Kaci Paradis Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ken B. Peterson, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry v. United Parcel Service, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Kay Tellinghuisen v. Chrysler Group, LLC, a foreign limited liability company transacting business in the State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Kay Tellinghuisen v. Chrysler Group, LLC, a foreign limited liability company transacting business in the State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
RAM Mutual Insurance Company v. EMC Property & Casualty Company, John Shriver as Trustee for the Next of … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
RAM Mutual Insurance Company v. EMC Property & Casualty Company, John Shriver as Trustee for the Next of … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
DECISION “A motion for summary judgment shall be granted when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that either party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
Lakes Area Business Ass'n v. City of Forest Lake 842 N.W.2d 320 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Lakes Area Business Ass'n v. City of Forest Lake 842 N.W.2d 320 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
We “must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was granted.”
Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A. 842 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A. 842 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Leave to amend “should be freely granted, except where to do so would result in prejudice to the other party.” *18 761 (Minn.1993).
Westfield Insurane Co. v. Wensmann, Inc. 840 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Westfield Insurane Co. v. Wensmann, Inc. 840 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In determining whether the district court properly granted a respondent’s summary-judgment motion, we “must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was granted.”
National Council on Teacher Quality v. Minnesota State Colleges & Universities 837 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
National Council on Teacher Quality v. Minnesota State Colleges & Universities 837 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center v. Avera Marshall 836 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
LeDoux v. M.A. Mortenson Co. 835 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center v. Avera Marshall 836 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
ANALYSIS “A motion for summary judgment shall be granted when the pleadings, deposi *554 tions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that either party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” see Minn. R. Civ.
LeDoux v. M.A. Mortenson Co. 835 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Limberg v. Mitchell 834 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Limberg v. Mitchell 834 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wolters 831 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 2013
Dickhoff ex rel. Dickhoff v. Green 836 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 2013
Dickhoff ex rel. Dickhoff v. Green 836 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 2013
rejected only “reduced chance” — defined as a “mere reduction in chance of survival” — as a theory of recovery.
Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wolters 831 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 2013
Schober v. Commissioner of Revenue 853 N.W.2d 102 Minn. 2013
Schober v. Commissioner of Revenue 853 N.W.2d 102 Minn. 2013
Embree v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n 828 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 2013