Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett, 490 N.W.2d 108.

177 citing documents.

Reese v. Brookdale Motors, Inc. 567 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett
Anderson v. Crestliner, Inc. 564 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Anderson v. Crestliner, Inc. 564 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett
Burbach v. Armstrong Rigging & Erecting, Inc. 560 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Burbach v. Armstrong Rigging & Erecting, Inc. 560 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett
Cummings v. Koehnen 556 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Cummings v. Koehnen 556 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett
Blue Earth County Pork Producers, Inc. v. County of Blue Earth 558 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Blue Earth County Pork Producers, Inc. v. County of Blue Earth 558 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett
FIRST BANK OF MINNESOTA v. Olson 557 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
FIRST BANK OF MINNESOTA v. Olson 557 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett, (proximate cause); Admiral Merchants *624 Motor Freight v. O’Connor & Hannan, (damages).
R.A., Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. 556 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
R.A., Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. 556 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett
HB by and Through Clark v. Whittemore 552 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1996
HB by and Through Clark v. Whittemore 552 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1996
3 We review the summary judgment “to determine whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the trial court erred in its application of the law.” Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett
Krollman v. City of Hibbing 550 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Krollman v. City of Hibbing 550 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett
DLH, Inc. v. Russ 544 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
DLH, Inc. v. Russ 544 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett
Bliss v. Stevens 544 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Bliss v. Stevens 544 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett
Ross v. Briggs and Morgan 540 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1995
Ross v. Briggs and Morgan 540 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1995
See Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. v. O’Connor & Hannan, Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett, Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe
Faimon v. Winona State University 540 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Watson ex rel. Hanson v. Metropolitan Transit Commission 540 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Watson ex rel. Hanson v. Metropolitan Transit Commission 540 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett
Faimon v. Winona State University 540 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett
Donaldson v. Young Women's Christian Ass'n of Duluth 539 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 1995
Lubbers v. Anderson 539 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1995
Donaldson v. Young Women's Christian Ass'n of Duluth 539 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 1995
When reviewing summary judgment, we must determine “whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the trial court erred in its application of the law.” Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett
Lubbers v. Anderson 539 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1995
We have said that in order for a party’s negligence to be the proximate cause of an injury “the act [must be] one which the party ought, in the exercise of ordinary care, to have anticipated was likely to result in injury to others, * * * though he could not have anticipated the particular injury which did happen.” Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett, (quoting Ponticas v. K.M.S.
Kottschade v. City of Rochester 537 N.W.2d 301 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Kottschade v. City of Rochester 537 N.W.2d 301 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett
St. Jude Medical, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. 536 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
St. Jude Medical, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. 536 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett
HB BY AND THROUGH CLARKE v. Whittemore 533 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
H.B. ex rel. Clarke v. Whittemore 533 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
HB BY AND THROUGH CLARKE v. Whittemore 533 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett
H.B. ex rel. Clarke v. Whittemore 533 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett
Elstrom v. Independent School District No. 270 533 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Elstrom v. Independent School District No. 270 533 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett
Young v. 2911 CORP. 529 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Young v. 2911 CORP. 529 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett
Lahr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 528 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Lahr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 528 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett
Jostens, Inc. v. Northfield Insurance Co. 527 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Estate of Benson Ex Rel. Benson v. Minnesota Board of Medical Practice 526 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Jostens, Inc. v. Northfield Insurance Co. 527 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett
Estate of Benson Ex Rel. Benson v. Minnesota Board of Medical Practice 526 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett, (in reviewing summary judgment, the evidence is viewed in a light most favorable to non-moving party to determine whether fact issues exist and whether trial court erroneously applied law).
Independent School District No. 197 v. Accident & Casualty Insurance of Winterthur 525 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 1995