Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lindgren v. Clearwater National Corp., 517 N.W.2d 574.

16 citing documents.

A22-0545 A22-0547 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See United States v. O’Shaughnessy
James Russell, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Lindgren v. Clearwater Nat’l Corp., (mem.).
In re: the Trust of the Arnold G. A. Schauer and Yvonne B. Schauer Family Irrevocable Trust. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“So long as the trustees act in good faith, from proper motives, and within the bounds of reasonable judgment, the court will not interfere with their decisions.” United States v. O’Shaughnessy
In the Matter of the John P. Weitzel and Mary M. Weitzel 2007 Irrevocable Trust F/B/O Terese M. … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“So long as the trustees act in good faith, from proper motives, and within the bounds of reasonable judgment, the court will not interfere with their decisions.” United States v. O’Shaughnessy, d 574, 577 (Minn. 1994).
In re G.B. Van Dusen Marital Trust 834 N.W.2d 514 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Thus, even if the trustees have “absolute, unlimited, or uncontrolled discretion, any attempt to violate the settlor’s intent or the trust’s purpose is considered an abuse of discretion.” United States v. O’Shaughnessy, (citing Restatement (Second) Trusts § 187 emt.
In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor Trust 818 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 2012
See United States v. O’Shaughnessy
In Re Rosckes v. County of Carver 783 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Id.; United States v. O’Shaughnessy
Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A. 756 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
v. Beckler, (citing United States v. O’Shaughnessy, ).
In Re Appeal of Decision of Commissioner of Human Services 725 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
See United States v. O’Shaughnessy, (even when vested with complete discretion, trustee cannot violate settlor’s intent or trust’s purpose without committing abuse of discretion).
In Re Ruth Easton Fund 680 N.W.2d 541 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
United States v. O’Shaughnessy
In Re Estate of King 668 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
United States v. O’Shaughnessy
In Re Horton 668 N.W.2d 208 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
See United States v. O’Shaughnessy, (concluding that the words “may pay” revealed settlors’ intent to create a discretionary trust).
Norwest Bank Minnesota North, N.A. v. Beckler 663 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
United States v. O’Shaughnessy
Mohrenweiser v. Blomer 573 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Mohrenweiser v. Blomer 573 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
See Lindgren v. Clearwater Nat’l Corp., (construing de novo whether letter of intent was enforceable contract or unenforceable agreement to agree); see also A.J.
Hurtig v. Gabrielson 525 N.W.2d 612 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
United States v. O’Shaughnessy