Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Willis v. County of Sherburne, 555 N.W.2d 277.

58 citing documents.

Shaw v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota 594 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Shaw v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota 594 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
See, (involving termination of county department director); Dietz, d at 239 (involving termination of nursing home administrator); Dokmo v. Independent Sch.
MacCharles v. State Department of Revenue 584 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
MacCharles v. State Department of Revenue 584 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(holding that certiorari is the proper means for obtaining review of quasi-judicial decisions).
Minnesota Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Board of Education 567 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Minnesota Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Board of Education 567 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-81 (Minn.1996) (characterizing Dokmo as reiterating the principles governing review of quasi-judicial decisions of executive bodies); Meath, d at 277 (certiorari unavailable because denial of compensation from the harmful substance compensation account not a quasi-judicial decision); Dietz v. Dodge Count
Mowry v. Young 565 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Mowry v. Young 565 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-82 (Minn.1996) (writ of certiorari was only method by which discharged employee could obtain judicial review of his claim that county breached his employment contract by failing to follow the lay-off and termination procedures set forth in employee handbook); Dokmo v. Independent Sch.