Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Crims, 540 N.W.2d 860.

78 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Fonati McArthur Diggs Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Fonati McArthur Diggs Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Minn. Stat. § 609.322 (2010); (“[T]he victim’s sexual history is normally irrelevant in a sexual assault prosecution.”), review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Jerard Swenson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Jerard Swenson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Under the Due Process Clause, “every criminal defendant has a right to fundamental fairness and to be afforded a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Alex Cennedi Closmore Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Donavon Duane Bellanger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Donavon Duane Bellanger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that, “[u]nless and until a defendant shows the victim’s sexual history to be relevant to the facts at bar, this particular form of 7 character evidence simply is not admissible under the normal rules of evidence”), review denied (Minn
State of Minnesota v. Alex Cennedi Closmore Minn. Ct. App. 2014
–65 (Minn. App. 1995) (“[A] [district] court may properly refer to its initial charge when that charge provides the jury with the guidance necessary to resolve its confusion.”), review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Enamidem Celestine Okon Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Leith Renville Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Leith Renville Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Enamidem Celestine Okon Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Special circumstances” include evidence showing a predisposition to fabricate a charge of rape, id., and “[evidence that] explains a physical fact in issue at trial, suggests bias or ulterior motive, or establishes a pattern of behavior clearly similar to the conduct at issue.” (emphasis omitted), review denied (Minn. 23 Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Dontrell Dyna Flowers Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Dontrell Dyna Flowers Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. 5 Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Javier Zapien-Arreola Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Javier Zapien-Arreola Minn. Ct. App. 2014
at 340, and “cannot withstand a rule 403 weighing unless special circumstances enhance its probative value,” review denied (Minn. Jan.
State v. Olsen 824 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Olsen 824 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-68 (Minn.App.1995), review denied (Minn. Jan.
State v. Grigsby 806 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Grigsby 806 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
review denied (Minn. Jan.
State v. Carroll 639 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Carroll 639 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-67 (Minn.App.1995) (quotation and citations omitted), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Risk Level Determination of C.M. 578 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Matter of Cm 578 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In re the Risk Level Determination of C.M. 578 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
A second canon of statutory construction provides that where a statute is ambiguous and one interpretation gives rise to a constitutional conflict, courts will adopt an interpretation “that stands in harmony with the Constitution, even if the alternative construction might otherwise seem a more accurate reflection of legislative intent.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
Matter of Cm 578 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
review denied (Minn. Jan.
State v. Davis 546 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Davis 546 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1996

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by