Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Welfare of JM, 574 N.W.2d 717.

86 citing documents.

In Re the Welfare of the Children of D.F. 752 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
But we will “closely inquire into the sufficiency of the evidence to determine whether it was clear and convincing.”
In Re the Welfare of the Children of T.R. 750 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 2008
In Re the Welfare of the Children of T.R. 750 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 2008
In re Welfare of J.M., J.M., & M.M.
In Re the Welfare of the Child of T.P. 747 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 2008
In Re the Welfare of the Child of T.P. 747 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 2008
Custom Ag Service of Montevideo, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 728 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 2007
Custom Ag Service of Montevideo, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 728 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 2007
In Re the Children of T.A.A. 702 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 2005
In Re the Children of T.A.A. 702 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 2005
In Re the Welfare of D.T.P. 685 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Welfare of D.T.P. 685 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Welfare of the Children of R.W. 678 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 2004
In Re the Welfare of the Children of R.W. 678 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 2004
In Re the Termination of the Parental Rights of Tanghe 672 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Followed In Re the Termination of the Parental Rights of Tanghe 672 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
overruled in part on other grounds by -24 (Minn.1998).
In Re the Children of Wildey 669 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Children of Wildey 669 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
GUZMAN EX REL. LOSOYA v. US West, Inc. 667 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
GUZMAN EX REL. LOSOYA v. US West, Inc. 667 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
“If the statutory language is plain and unambiguous, the court must give it its plain meaning.” (citation omitted).
In Re Child of E.V. 634 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Child of E.V. 634 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In re A.K. 633 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re AK 633 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re AK 633 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In re A.K. 633 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re the Welfare of P.R.L. 622 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 2001
In Re the Welfare of P.R.L. 622 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 2001
Kersten v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co. 608 N.W.2d 869 Minn. 2000
Kersten v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co. 608 N.W.2d 869 Minn. 2000
Carlson v. Augsburg College 604 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Carlson v. Augsburg College 604 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
E.N. v. Special School District No. 1 603 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
E.N. v. Special School District No. 1 603 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
A well-referenced canon of statutory construction stipulates that “courts cannot supply that which the legislature purposely omits or inadvertently *349 overlooks.” Wallace v. Commissioner of Taxation, 289 Minn. 220, 230
In Re Linehan 594 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 1999
In Re Linehan 594 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 1999
If statutory language is plain and unambiguous, the court must give it its plain meaning.” (citations omitted).
Silva v. Maplewood Care Center 582 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 1998