Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Art Goebel, Inc. v. North Suburban Agencies, Inc., 567 N.W.2d 511.

87 citing documents.

George v. Evenson 754 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 2008
We interpret an arbitration agreement “to give effect to the intention of the parties as expressed in the language they used in drafting the whole [agreement].” Art Goebel, Inc. v. N. Suburban Agencies, Inc.
In Re GlaxoSmithKline Plc 713 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re GlaxoSmithKline Plc 713 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Art Goebel, Inc. v. N. Suburban Agencies, Inc., see also Wiegel v. City of St.
River Valley Truck Center, Inc. v. Interstate Companies 704 N.W.2d 154 Minn. 2005
Molloy v. Meier 679 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 2004
Molloy v. Meier 679 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 2004
Co. v. A.C.C.T., Inc., (quoting Art Goebel, Inc. v. North Suburban Agencies, Inc., ).
Edina Development Corporation v. Hurrle 670 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Edina Development Corporation v. Hurrle 670 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Art Goebel, Inc. v. N. Suburban Agencies, Inc.
Murphy v. Allina Health System 668 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Murphy v. Allina Health System 668 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Art Goebel, Inc. v. N. Suburban Agencies, Inc.
Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co. 666 N.W.2d 339 Minn. 2003
Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co. 666 N.W.2d 339 Minn. 2003
“A contract is ambiguous if, based upon its language alone, it is reasonably susceptible of more than one interpretation.” Art Goebel, Inc. v. N. Suburban Agencies, Inc.
Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of Minnesota 664 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 2003
Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of Minnesota 664 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 2003
Art Goebel, Inc. v. N. Suburban Agencies, Inc.
Kolton v. County of Anoka 645 N.W.2d 403 Minn. 2002
Kolton v. County of Anoka 645 N.W.2d 403 Minn. 2002
Co. v. A.C.C.T., Inc., Art Goebel, Inc. v. N. Suburban Agencies, Inc.
Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P. 644 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 2002
Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P. 644 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 2002
Art Goebel, Inc. v. N. Suburban Agencies, Inc.
Prior Lake American v. Mader 642 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 2002
Prior Lake American v. Mader 642 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 2002
Co. v. A.C.C.T., Inc., Art Goebel, Inc. v. N. Suburban Agencies, Inc.
Mollico v. Mollico 628 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Mollico v. Mollico 628 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Art Goebel, Inc. v. North Suburban Agencies, Inc.
S O Designs USA, Inc. v. Rollerblade, Inc. 620 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
S O Designs USA, Inc. v. Rollerblade, Inc. 620 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Metro Milwaukee Auto Auction v. Coulson 604 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Metro Milwaukee Auto Auction v. Coulson 604 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Art Goebel, Inc. v. North Suburban Agencies, Inc., (“A de novo standard of review is used to determine whether the district court erred in its application of the law.”) We need not defer to the district court when reviewing legal issues.
Koehnen v. Dufuor 590 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1999
Koehnen v. Dufuor 590 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1999
Art Goebel, Inc. v. North Suburban Agencies, Inc.
Mauer v. Kircher 587 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
A.A. Metcalf Moving & Storage Co. v. North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale Schools 587 N.W.2d 311 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
A.A. Metcalf Moving & Storage Co. v. North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale Schools 587 N.W.2d 311 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
The supreme court has explained that “[t]he cardinal purpose of construing a contract is to give effect to the intention of the parties as expressed in the language they used in drafting the whole contract.” Art Goebel, Inc. v. North Suburban Agencies, Inc., (citation omitted).
Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. A.C.C.T., Inc. 580 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1998
Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. A.C.C.T., Inc. 580 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1998
*493 I. The certified question arises from a denial of summary judgment; therefore, “this court reviews the record to determine whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the lower courts erred in then-application of the law.” Art Goebel, Inc. v. North Suburban Agencies, Inc.
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. Boyne 578 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1998
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. Boyne 578 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1998
Art Goebel, Inc. v. North Suburban Agencies, Inc.
State v. Basting 572 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1997
State v. Basting 572 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1997

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by