Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Gully v. Gully, 599 N.W.2d 814.
- In Re the Marriage of Rose v. Rose 765 N.W.2d 142 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
- In Re the Marriage of Rose v. Rose 765 N.W.2d 142 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
- Milner v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 748 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 2008
- Milner v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 748 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 2008
- Butt v. Schmidt 747 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 2008
-
Butt v. Schmidt
747 N.W.2d 566
Minn. 2008
We have said that “[w]e will reverse a district court’s order regarding child support only if we are convinced that the district court abused its broad discretion by reaching a clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record.” ( ).
- Lee v. Lee 749 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
- Lee v. Lee 749 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
- Hebert v. City of Fifty Lakes 744 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 2008
-
Hebert v. City of Fifty Lakes
744 N.W.2d 226
Minn. 2008
("[I]t is a maxim of equity that he who seeks equity must do equity”) (internal quotation omitted).
- Brekke v. THM Biomedical, Inc. 683 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 2004
- Vogelsberg v. Vogelsberg 672 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
Vogelsberg v. Vogelsberg
672 N.W.2d 602
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(noting that district courts review a CSM’s decision de novo); (noting that appellate courts review a district court’s custody modifications under abuse-of-discretion standard); (noting that appellate courts apply the same standard of review to orders issued by the CSM as they apply to orders issued by t
- Jackel v. Brower 668 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- Rooney v. Rooney 669 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- Jackel v. Brower 668 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
Rooney v. Rooney
669 N.W.2d 362
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Under the doctrine of laches, “when one sits on one’s rights for too long a time, that person’s claim should be es-topped from continuing because it would be inequitable to require the defendant to fight the suit.”
- Robert W. Carlstrom Co. v. German Evangelical Lutheran St. Paul's Congregation of the Unaltered Augsburg Confession at Jordan 662 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
Robert W. Carlstrom Co. v. German Evangelical Lutheran St. Paul's Congregation of the Unaltered Augsburg Confession at Jordan
662 N.W.2d 168
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(appellate courts apply an abuse-of-discretion standard to the issue of attorney fees).
- Heidbreder v. Carton 645 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2002
- Putz v. Putz 645 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 2002
- Putz v. Putz 645 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 2002
- Heidbreder v. Carton 645 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2002
- Marriage of Geske v. Marcolina 642 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- Marriage of Ludwigson v. Ludwigson 642 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
Marriage of Ludwigson v. Ludwigson
642 N.W.2d 441
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
This court will reverse a trial court’s order regarding child support modification “only if we are convinced that the court abused its broad discretion” and reached a “conclusion that is against the logic and the facts on [the] record.” (alteration in original) (quotation omitted).
- Marriage of Matson v. Matson 638 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
Marriage of Matson v. Matson
638 N.W.2d 462
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
(child support); (parenting time); , 151 (Minn.1989) (custody); (recusal motion), review denied (Minn. Aug.
- Gunderson v. Harrington 632 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2001
- Marriage of Geske v. Marcolina 624 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
Marriage of Geske v. Marcolina
624 N.W.2d 813
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
1, is not fatal to an award where review of the order “reasonably implies” that the district court considered the relevant factors and where the district court “was familiar with the history of the case” and “had access to the parties’ financial records.” -26 (Minn.1999).