Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Cross, 577 N.W.2d 721.
- State v. Hager 727 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Laine 715 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 2006
-
State v. Laine
715 N.W.2d 425
Minn. 2006
-83 (Minn.2003) (holding that district court did not err in its instructions on the state’s burden of proof — while state was required to prove past pattern of domestic abuse beyond a reasonable doubt it was not required to prove each act making up the past pattern beyond a reasonable doubt); -27 (Minn.1998) (same).
- State v. Barnes 713 N.W.2d 325 Minn. 2006
-
State v. Barnes
713 N.W.2d 325
Minn. 2006
(upholding an identical element from the first-degree child abuse murder statute).
- In Re the Welfare of T.C.J. 689 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- In Re the Welfare of T.C.J. 689 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. White 684 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 2004
- State v. White 684 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 2004
- State v. Sanchez-Diaz 683 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 2004
- State v. Sanchez-Diaz 683 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 2004
- State v. McCoy 682 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 2004
-
State v. McCoy
682 N.W.2d 153
Minn. 2004
§ 634.20, “the legislature has expressed an intent to remove evidence of ‘similar prior conduct’ in domestic abuse (non-homicide) prosecutions from the ‘clear and convincing’ standard of Rule 404(b).” , 726 n. 2 (Minn.1998).
- State v. Blooflat 671 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- State v. Blooflat 671 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- State v. McCoy 668 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
State v. McCoy
668 N.W.2d 425
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
The supreme court addressed the standard of proof under section 634.20 in a a case in which the court was required to decide whether the state had to prove a prior act of domestic abuse by clear and convincing evidence when evidence of that act was offered to prove an element of the charge of first-degree domestic-abuse homicide.
- State v. Gutierrez 667 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 2003
- State v. Gutierrez 667 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 2003
- State v. Manley 664 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 2003
- State v. Manley 664 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 2003
- State v. Baird 654 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 2002
- State v. Baird 654 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 2002
- State v. Kelbel 648 N.W.2d 690 Minn. 2002
-
State v. Kelbel
648 N.W.2d 690
Minn. 2002
In a memorandum of law accompanying its order, the court explained that it rejected Kelbel’s
- State v. Cyrette 636 N.W.2d 343 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Cyrette 636 N.W.2d 343 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Richardson 633 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Richardson 633 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Charles 634 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Charles 634 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Crowsbreast 629 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 2001
- State v. Crowsbreast 629 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 2001
- State v. Oates 611 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Waino 611 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Waino 611 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
State v. Oates
611 N.W.2d 580
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
The state’s to establish that Spreigl procedures do not apply to “relationship” evidence is misplaced.
- State v. Gebremariam 590 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1999