Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Angell v. Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority, 578 N.W.2d 343.

26 citing documents.

Brianne Goad, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Reg’l Rail Auth., (quotation omitted).
Minor Doe 601, a minor, by and through his mother and natural guardian, Mother Doe 601, Appellants, vs. … Minn. 2025
Explained Minor Doe 601, a minor, by and through his mother and natural guardian, Mother Doe 601, Appellants, vs. … Minn. 2025
Generally, a municipality must “produce evidence its conduct was of a policy-making nature involving social, political, or economic considerations, rather than merely professional or scientific judgments.” Steinke, d at 175; Angell v. Hennepin County Reg’l Rail Auth., (concluding municipality was not immune from liability 14 In Holmquist, we explained that the discretionary-function exception be interpreted no more broadly than necessary to serve the separation of powers concerns underlying the
Shane Feldhaus v. City of Minnetonka Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Shane Feldhaus v. City of Minnetonka Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Brandon Grim, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Reg’l Rail Auth., (quotation omitted).
Magnolia 8 Properties, LLC v. City of Maple Plain 893 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Magnolia 8 Properties, LLC v. City of Maple Plain 893 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Reg’l Rail Auth., -48 (Minn. 1998) (concluding that statutory immunity did not apply because the failure “to block off the loading dock or to warn, of its presence” involved “professional judgments regarding where and how to implement the policy of restricting access” to property, which were operational decisions); Holmquist v. Sta
Jason Hoff v. Earl Surman 883 N.W.2d 631 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jason Hoff v. Earl Surman 883 N.W.2d 631 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Reg’l Rail Auth., (noting that the supreme court has consistently interpreted another immunity exception in the same statute narrowly).
Jessica Mattson v. City of Rushford, Minnowa Construction, Inc., State of Minnesota Department of Transportation, Edwards and Kelcey, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jessica Mattson v. City of Rushford, Minnowa Construction, Inc., State of Minnesota Department of Transportation, Edwards and Kelcey, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-48 (Minn. 1998) (“When the government implements established policy it is generally not immune from liability.”).
Anderson v. Anoka Hennepin Independent School District 11 655 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Anderson v. Anoka Hennepin Independent School District 11 655 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
6 (2002), as "statutory immunity,” although some earlier cases refer to it as "discretionary immunity.” Angeli v. Hennepin County Reg’l Rail Auth., , 345 n. 2 (Minn.1998).
Zaske Ex Rel. Bratsch v. Lee 651 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Zaske Ex Rel. Bratsch v. Lee 651 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Fear v. Independent School District 911 634 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Fear v. Independent School District 911 634 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Angell v. Hennepin County Reg’l Rail Auth.
Christopherson v. City of Albert Lea 623 N.W.2d 272 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Christopherson v. City of Albert Lea 623 N.W.2d 272 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Angell v. Hennepin County Reg’l Rail Auth.
Stansell v. City of Northfield 618 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Stansell v. City of Northfield 618 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Perovich v. Bituminous Consulting & Contracting Co. 614 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Perovich v. Bituminous Consulting & Contracting Co. 614 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
As a matter of statutory construction, we presume that “the legislative body uses the same term consistently in different statutes.” aff'd
Conlin v. City of Saint Paul 605 N.W.2d 396 Minn. 2000
Conlin v. City of Saint Paul 605 N.W.2d 396 Minn. 2000