DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Welfare of C.R.M., 611 N.W.2d 802.

63 citing documents.

  • State v. White 692 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • State v. Al-Naseer 678 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Al-Naseer 678 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    “[A] criminal state of mind, or a criminal intent, is a necessary element of any crime having its origin in common law.” ().
  • State v. Benniefield 678 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 2004
  • State v. Benniefield 678 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 2004
    In we examined the language of a somewhat similar criminal statute that makes it a felony offense to possess a dangerous weapon on school property.
  • State v. Arkell 672 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 2003
  • State v. Arkell 672 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 2003
    5 As we previously recognized, the United States Supreme Court has noted that statutes “concerning ‘public welfare’ or ‘regulatory offenses,’ which typically ‘regulate potentially harmful or injurious items,’ are not subject to a presumption requiring proof of a mens rea to establish *567 liability.” (quoting Staples v. U.S., 511 U.S. 600, 606-07 , 114 S.Ct.
  • State v. Nelson 671 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Nelson 671 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Bluhm 663 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Bluhm 663 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Arkell 657 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Arkell 657 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600, 607 , 114 S.Ct.