Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Schumacher v. Schumacher, 627 N.W.2d 725.

62 citing documents.

Randy L. Brandt v. Wayne E. Lee Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Randy L. Brandt v. Wayne E. Lee Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“In order to establish a claim for unjust enrichment, the claimant must show that another party knowingly received something of value to which he was not entitled, and that the circumstances are such that it would be unjust for that person to retain the benefit.”
Langford Tool & Drill Co. v. The 401 Group, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Langford Tool & Drill Co. v. The 401 Group, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Peter Farrell v. Aimee Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Peter Farrell v. Aimee Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
for the proposition that unjust enrichment occurs when a party knowingly receives something of value to which the party is not entitled, and the circumstances are such that it would be unjust for the person to retain the benefit.
Robert Davis Construction, Inc. v. Morgan C. Althoen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Robert Davis Construction, Inc. v. Morgan C. Althoen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Anita W. Sluck v. Terence E. Rapacz Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Anita W. Sluck v. Terence E. Rapacz Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Servs., Inc., (quotation omitted), or when it is “morally wrong” to do so
Hamann v. Park Nicollet Clinic 792 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Hamann v. Park Nicollet Clinic 792 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
An unjust-enrichment claim requires proof that a party “was unjustly enriched in the sense that the term ‘unjustly’ could mean illegally or unlawfully,” id., or as a result of fraudulent inducement or unconscionable conduct, -30 (Minn.App.2001).